We Knew It Was Coming

DeluxAuto said:

A little advice for a small man:

1. Quit trolling and "hunting" alts - you're most likely pushing 60, give it up.
2. Learn to read.
3. Comprehend what you just read.
4. Shut up.

Click to expand...

This reads like good advice to yourself more than anything..

Conager said:

You clearly live in an alternative reality.

Click to expand...

You echoed my thoughts exactly.

Tigersman said:

Until the next president appoints a new AG who will most likely re-instate the charges.

Click to expand...

You need to learn what "with prejudice" and "double jeopardy" mean.

HisArpy said:

You need to learn what "with prejudice" and "double jeopardy" mean.

Click to expand...

Ignorance abounds.

Tigersman said:

The DOJ did not say this, AG Barr said this just like Trump ordered.

Click to expand...

You're full of shit. The President doesn't dictate Barr's public statements, the law does.

"What I can tell you is that I knew that he lied to me. And I know the President made the right decision with regard to him."


[Missing: Pence’s spine.]

Rightguide said:

You're full of shit. The President doesn't dictate Barr's public statements, the law does.

Click to expand...

Even a sycophant like you can’t be this gullible.

Adre said:

Even a sycophant like you can’t be this gullible.

Click to expand...

Take a lesson from your last three years of failed Trump narratives and begin the years long effort of re-building your absolutely crushed credibility.

DeluxAuto said:

A little advice for a small man:

1. Quit trolling and "hunting" alts - you're most likely pushing 60, give it up.
2. Learn to read.
3. Comprehend what you just read.
4. Shut up.

Click to expand...

SpeareChucker said:

This reads like good advice to yourself more than anything..

Click to expand...

1. I don't hunt alts, I'm nowhere near sixty.
2. I can obviously read.
3. I'm comprehending your before dawn trolling.
4. I don't average over 20 posts per day.

So close though!

Anybody can say anything.

Tell that to your reader...

Anybody can toss out
random words.

Like you just did.

Rightguide said:

The President doesn't dictate Barr's public statements, the law does.

Click to expand...

Can't Barr be a good wing man like Eric Holder was for President Obama?

There's always a point early on in a then current event where known facts lean one way or the other and reasonable people might see the unknown facts supporting the narrative that they think willl finally emerge when all the truth is known.

Pretty consistently on the board the loudmouths that lean to the left or always talking with certitude about things that are unknown as if they are known because those speculations lean their direction.

Just for example I don't necessarily agree with your thread title on Flynn's exoneration that we actually did "know" this was coming. Early on though, you were saying things about how discovery might lead to his examination and so forth and they were all caterwauling about, "But, but, he plead guilty, he pleads guilty..., HE PLEAD GUILTY!...end of story.. "

I was more sanguine than you were as enough facts came out to paint the picture that he was most likely not guilty. I assumed it was going to end up with a Trump pardon, probably in his second term, and the shrieks from the left would have been glorious but I think for Flynn and his family the actual exoneration was much better. Obviously.

I'm kind of surprised that some of the documents survived. But now we have them and what is known as known in is not in dispute by anyone other than the dissing Jen us in the hopelessly ill informed.

Changed nothing from the usual suspects. Directions if the fax that were previously unknown that are actually no now and do not support their narrative do not exist when obviously they do. This stuff is in writing this isn't even someone's recollection and wondering who influenced a witnesses recollection or testimony, we have in some cases handwritten notes in the principles own handwriting. It doesn't get more black and white than that yet still they deny.

None of them are really worth holding even the most casual of conversations about anything because they don't go into it with any kind of good faith, intelligence or interest in actual truth. They just want "their" truth. Only people on the left refer to truth as a fungible commodity.

Tigersman said:

Until the next president appoints a new AG who will most likely re-instate the charges.

Click to expand...

Five years from now no one will fucking care.

hogjack said:

Can't Barr be a good wing man like Eric Holder was for President Obama?

Click to expand...

Barr is a preeminent attorney with a nationally recognized reputation and a former Attorney General who knows the ropes. If the law is on the President's side Barr will pursue it relentlessly. If the President gives him an unlawful order you can expect Bill Barr to resign before carrying it out.

Rightguide said:

If the President gives him an unlawful order you can expect Bill Barr to resign before carrying it out.

Click to expand...

AG Barr does not come across as Trump's "wing man," that's for sure. Eric Holder, conversely, gleefully played into the entourage role.

Metaphorically, Barr would love to shove Trump's tweets up that fat presidential keister.

hogjack said:

AG Barr does not come across as Trump's "wing man," that's for sure. Eric Holder, conversely, gleefully played into the entourage role.

Metaphorically, Barr would love to shove Trump's tweets up that fat presidential keister.

Click to expand...

The difference is Holder's fidelity to the law is corrupted by ideology. This is not the case with Barr who has an old school reverence for the law.

As an aside, the Covington law firm who originally fucked up Flynn's case id Eric Holder's law firm. I wonder how much of that fucked upness was influenced by him being Obama's "wingman?"

A new twist in the Michael Flynn case: A judge opened the door to legal challenges over the Justice Department’s motion to drop the charge.

Toldya "Judge" Sully in his dottage will be a problem

tog18 said:

A new twist in the Michael Flynn case: A judge opened the door to legal challenges over the Justice Department’s motion to drop the charge.

Click to expand...

Flynn's lawyers filed a brief in opposition to allowing Amici to file briefs in the case.

Sullivan has put the case on indefinite hold while he creates guidelines for an amici briefing schedule.

If he doesn't reverse himself, I suspect that Flynn's lawyers will file an emergency writ with the appeals court to block the proposed outside interests and force a dismissal.

The idea that The Court needs "friends" to tell him whether to accept a withdrawal by the State who has acknowledged wrongful prosecution is pretty funny.

How would you prosecute a defendant when the State is on record admitting prosecutorial misconduct and the absence of an actual crime? Prosecute him for which statutory violation when the State has given testimony that there was no crime.? Who is going to speak for the State's <non->interest in the case if the State declines to prosecute?

Gee, an independent minded judge. Wouldn’t want one of those now would we. At least someone still believes in the separation of the Executive and Judicial.

Conager said:

The idea that The Court needs "friends" to tell him whether to accept a withdrawal by the State who has acknowledged wrongful prosecution is pretty funny.

How would you prosecute a defendant when the State is on record admitting prosecutorial misconduct and the absence of an actual crime? Prosecute him for which statutory violation when the State has given testimony that there was no crime.? Who is going to speak for the State's <non->interest in the case if the State declines to prosecute?

Click to expand...

He can force the State to go forward. Flynn pleaded guilty, and there's been a sentencing memo already submitted. He can tell the Gov to show up or be sanctioned.

At that point Sullivan can accept the plea and sentence Flynn. This punts the political / legal football to the appeals court to vacate and remand for dismissal. It also allows Sullivan to "ignore" the misconduct. This disposes of the case and gets it out of his courtroom while simultaneously getting HIM out of the spotlight.

The amici ploy is an attempt to delay the case until after the election. Which is why I see an emergency writ being filed in the near future.

Adre said:

Gee, an independent minded judge. Wouldn’t want one of those now would we. At least someone still believes in the separation of the Executive and Judicial.

Click to expand...

^ has no fucking clue how the justice system works.

HisArpy said:

^ has no fucking clue how the justice system works.

Click to expand...

I know enough to understand the judge doesn’t have to ask how high when Barr (Trump) says jump.