Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

Not really.

Yea...really.

And, yes, it's my perception of you and you are completely powerless to do anything about it.

I don't give a shit about your incorrect perceptions.

They come off more like projections anyhow.

This obviously irritates Trumpettes like you more than it does me.

Whatever lies you gotta tell yourself. ;)

I'm just taking a break from the core function of this Web site.

LOL to fly your impotence, insecurity and lick some (D)emocrat ass.....
 
Triggered. :D

I've reduced you to 2nd grade playground in 4 posts....better than usual for you, but still pathetic.

Even Carnal Fart gets a half dozen or so posts in before she starts acting like a 5 year old.
 
Being an ideologue doesn't mean you don't screw yourself with your doctrinaire beliefs that don't match your individual interests.

So those countries are happiest because...what? This doesn't make any sense. Good job owning yourself racist.
 
So those countries are happiest because...what? This doesn't make any sense. Good job owning yourself racist.

I quoted the wrong post. I should have been quoting Ramone. But, really, you don't keep very good track of people's general posting positions here, do you? And what does racism have to do with any of it?
 
Communism is dead. The declared communists don't even follow it anymore. You waste your time and energy by opposing something that isn't even there anymore. But, hey, it's your time and energy and it keeps you out of real trouble, and with your beliefs you can be really troublesome to humanity.

Communism is alive and well in China, North Korea, and Vietnam. Putin being an ex KGB officer would like nothing more than to rebuild the old Soviet Union.
 
Communism is alive and well in China, North Korea, and Vietnam. Putin being an ex KGB officer would like nothing more than to rebuild the old Soviet Union.

No, it's not. Communism is not a functioning form of government or economy in any of those places. They are all autocracies, with three of them with raw oligarchy capitalism just below the surface. That isn't anything remotely like what communism is. Communism never took hold anywhere and it's just a pejorative word folks throw around to try to scare other folks and to avoid talking reality and specifics.
 
No, it's not. Communism is not a functioning form of government or economy in any of those places.

Total fuckin' denial.

They are all autocracies,

That doesn't make them not communist.

with three of them with raw oligarchy capitalism just below the surface.

"raw oligarchy capitalism" isn't even a thing.....you're full of shit.

That isn't anything remotely like what communism is. Communism never took hold anywhere and it's just a pejorative word folks throw around to try to scare other folks and to avoid talking reality and specifics.

More denial from the guy who avoids talking reality and specifics in favor of name calling. :rolleyes:
 
It is hilarious to see Botany Boy triggered . You're not alone. Trump, Mitch McConnell and Sean Hannity have flipped their shit over Cortez. They are already rolling out the big guns. They are treating this tiny little 28 yr old who got about 30,000 votes as the biggest threat to land in the US since al Qaeda.

It simply could not be plainer that the Rethugs (and you) are absolutely petrified.

https://weburbanist.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/Cold-War-Ads-Is-This-Tomorrow.jpg
 
It is hilarious to see Botany Boy triggered . You're not alone. Trump, Mitch McConnell and Sean Hannity have flipped their shit over Cortez.

LOL delusions.


"meh" and some decent discussion is about all I've gotten out of this.


They are already rolling out the big guns. They are treating this tiny little 28 yr old who got about 30,000 votes as the biggest threat to land in the US since al Qaeda.

Well...she is an anti-American politician who's pushing politics that are totally antithetical to the US and it's traditional values.

Might as well be an Al Queda leader being elected to office.

It simply could not be plainer that the Rethugs (and you) are absolutely petrified.

Not petrified here, I'm just embarrassed for the US and ashamed.

Curious why you and your kind hate the USA so much? :confused:
 
https://ocasio2018.com/issues

Fourteen issues detailed here.

Which ones are "totally antithetical to the US and it is traditional values"?

Medicare for all

Housing for all

Jobs for all

Everything about her gun control except
Mandate Universal and Improved Background Checks for Firearm Purchases

Pretty much all of it except for the equal rights bit...which is more about social equity than equal rights, so it's really borderline with that shit.
 
Read the Constitution lately?

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
Should be obvious. Maybe you need a dictionary.
 
Oooooh, "traditional values." I'm going to cry. So sweet.


LOL delusions.


"meh" and some decent discussion is about all I've gotten out of this.




Well...she is an anti-American politician who's pushing politics that are totally antithetical to the US and it's traditional values.

Might as well be an Al Queda leader being elected to office.



Not petrified here, I'm just embarrassed for the US and ashamed.

Curious why you and your kind hate the USA so much? :confused:

:D
 
She's Hispanic and a woman, knowing how thuggish rightwingers are, hopefully they don't send her any threats. But you know how they roll, they are violent beasts. :rolleyes:

Proud of her! Beautiful lady!

I watched her briefly on The View this morning.

She seems very intelligent and capable. She touts herself as a Democrat Socialist.

Not bad for a former bartender. She's established a following.

I think she's taking the seat of someone who's poised to replace Nancy Pelosi.
 
Total fuckin' denial.



That doesn't make them not communist.



"raw oligarchy capitalism" isn't even a thing.....you're full of shit.



More denial from the guy who avoids talking reality and specifics in favor of name calling. :rolleyes:

He's not argument worthy. Srsly.
 
Read the Constitution lately?

Should be obvious. Maybe you need a dictionary.

Yep.

Exactly what part of that covers authoritarian social and economic oppression in the pursuit of social and economic equity?:confused:

Oooooh, "traditional values." I'm going to cry. So sweet.

:D

Like I said, you hate the USA and the core principals it was founded upon.

Life, liberty and the pursuit of ones happiness.....most if not all the individual rights like freedom of speech, association, religion and armament.

For whatever reason you and the left want to destroy that and effectively end the USA as it's been known at a fundamental level. Subvert it's sovereignty, rob and bankrupt it's citizenry.

Best of luck. ;)
 
Last edited:
Read the Constitution lately?

Should be obvious. Maybe you need a dictionary.

There is one big problem with your response concerning the Constitution. At the time when the Constitution was written and ratified "We the people" represented men only. Women were considered to be chattel with no rights except to be raped by their spouse, to be beaten by their spouse and should their spouse die and they remarried then all property and money was then to belong to the new spouse.

Our Nation was founded by men, for men and against women.
 
Life, liberty and the pursuit of ones happiness.....most if not all the individual rights like freedom of speech, association, religion and armament.

For whatever reason you and the left want to destroy that and effectively end the USA as it's been known at a fundamental level.



The rightard fundamentalists aka w(R)ongs are the ones most likely to oppress speech by restricting who can say what, where and under what conditions. Among others, blocking some books from school libraries. Blocking those of certain ages from reading or viewing things, etc.
 
The rightard fundamentalists aka w(R)ongs are the ones most likely to oppress speech by restricting who can say what, where and under what conditions.

Based upon what?

Lefties are every bit about speech control that the right is if not more so.

Among others, blocking some books from school libraries. Blocking those of certain ages from reading or viewing things, etc.

Minors don't count....they have extremely limited rights as it is and not letting them have open access to explicit materials isn't a violation of 1A rights anymore than not letting them drive, fuck, buy guns or drink booze.

Can you provide an example of the right wing being more prone than the left to infringe upon 1A rights of legal adults??
 
Trump calling the press the "enemy of the people."

Rightist fascist Trumptards chanting CNN Sucks and menacing reporters and shoving reporters at Hitleresque rallies

The WH banning certain press outlets from briefings, ignoring certain reporters, attacking outright certain reporters

Trump suggesting he will "look into" better libel laws

Trump saying they "should not be able to get away with it" and "something needs to be done"

Trump demanding that the press reveal their sources

Trump trashing the US Press while abroad

Trump not allowing the US Press but allowing the Russian Press into his Oval Office Meetings

Trump keeping infants and toddlers in Blackout Sites where the press is not allowed inside

The Republican Party being totally ok with all of this



Based upon what?

Can you provide an example of the right wing being more prone than the left to infringe upon 1A rights of legal adults??
 

Is not a god king nor is his opinon law or a platform much less any sort of coherent political philosophy.

You hate him, obsessively, I get it.

But none of what you posted is really relevant to the question I asked.

How is the right wing more prone than the left to infringe upon 1A rights of legal adults??

Hint: it isn't....both sides love to shit on free speech, manipulate the press/media, suppress religious views they don't like, political views they don't like. There is a long history of it from moderate to extreme on both ends.

Shit the only 2 political sects I can think of that expressly are against it are the anarchist and the liberals.
 
Yes it is relevant.

It doesn't matter that it's Trump, it's POTUS.

POTUS treating the press the way he does and trashing the 1A is light years worse than anything any small d or r does.

And the R Party lets him get away with it. You lose.



Is not a god king nor is his opinon law or a platform much less any sort of coherent political philosophy.

You hate him, obsessively, I get it.

But none of what you posted is really relevant to the question I asked.

How is the right wing more prone than the left to infringe upon 1A rights of legal adults??

Hint: it isn't....both sides love to shit on free speech, manipulate the press/media, suppress religious views they don't like, political views they don't like. There is a long history of it from moderate to extreme on both ends.

Shit the only 2 political sects I can think of that expressly are against it are the anarchist and the liberals.
 
https://ocasio2018.com/issues

Fourteen issues detailed here.

Which ones are "totally antithetical to the US and it is traditional values"?



For all the "OMG A SOCIALIST" hysteria, there are easily — easily — 200 congressional Republicans farther to the right than she is to the left.

We're so used to seeing the far right in our government that we rarely think about how unusual someone like Ted Cruz is by the standard of literally every other free nation on Earth.
 
Back
Top