♫ What you gonna do when the TRUTH comes for you ♫

Unabatable

Loves Spam
Joined
Nov 11, 2017
Posts
264
Allegedly, from newly released email communications FORCED by Congressional subpoenas, comes proof from FBI/DOJ fingertips that that infamous tarmac meet between Bubba and Obummer's AG was intended/supposed to be secret, that if not for the eagle eye/nose of a local reporter, the public would've never known of it.

:D

Lie to Feds - go to prison.

Feds lie to FOIA - not a problem - YET.

When the first leaked info of that intended secret meet did become public, FOIA requests to the FBI/DOJ asked for even more info about it; both outright lied and stated for the public record that no such info existed in their charge...

Until Congressional subpoenas then issued for the very same info produced a treasure trove of info proving both the FBI/DOJ intentionally lied to those FOIA requests and that the tarmac meet was supposed to be secret, and that both actively conspired to keep it as quiet as possible - even after it was already exposed.

What if it all starts unraveling on the progressive deep state? That Comey's FBI - under the authority of Lynch's DOJ - under the authority of Executive Obummer - purposely did everything they covertly thought they could get away with to politically protect Hillary Rodham Clinton, whose email escapades - which was the spark to this entire, completely politicized spectacle - are also now under comparable Congressional scrutiny?

What do they say about it's not the lie, it's the coverup.
 
Allegedly, from newly released email communications FORCED by Congressional subpoenas, comes proof from FBI/DOJ fingertips that that infamous tarmac meet between Bubba and Obummer's AG was intended/supposed to be secret, that if not for the eagle eye/nose of a local reporter, the public would've never known of it.

:D

Lie to Feds - go to prison.

Feds lie to FOIA - not a problem - YET.

When the first leaked info of that intended secret meet did become public, FOIA requests to the FBI/DOJ asked for even more info about it; both outright lied and stated for the public record that no such info existed in their charge...

Until Congressional subpoenas then issued for the very same info produced a treasure trove of info proving both the FBI/DOJ intentionally lied to those FOIA requests and that the tarmac meet was supposed to be secret, and that both actively conspired to keep it as quiet as possible - even after it was already exposed.

What if it all starts unraveling on the progressive deep state? That Comey's FBI - under the authority of Lynch's DOJ - under the authority of Executive Obummer - purposely did everything they covertly thought they could get away with to politically protect Hillary Rodham Clinton, whose email escapades - which was the spark to this entire, completely politicized spectacle - are also now under comparable Congressional scrutiny?

What do they say about it's not the lie, it's the coverup.

A word comes to mind, Collusion?
 
"Insanity, who really cares? Propaganda all is phony."
--R.Zimmerman

Patience, grasshopper. Await the indictments.

Insanity is repeating the same same tired old charges and expecting a different result.
 
FBI investigator interviews Hillary Clinton aides Cheryl Mills and Huma Mahmood Abedin about Hillary Clinton emails/servers. Abedin (Hillary's most intimate aide) insists she had no idea Clinton was running a private email server and only learned about it from the media; Mills says she not only had no clue about Clinton's private server, but she doesn't even know what a server is.

Except there's email evidence from Mills asking someone else if Hillary's private server is working ok, and the guy who ran Hillary's private server testified that he specifically informed Abedin all about Clinton's private email server.

Neither Mills or Abedin were charged with lying to that FBI investigator.

FBI investigator respectfully, politely travels to Hillary Clinton's home (rather than SOP of person of interest in a criminal investigation summoned to come to the FBI), interviews Hillary Clinton about her email stuff. He takes no notes, records no words. He's a $$$ contributor to her political campaigns. His mistress is a FBI lawyer, also a Hillary Clinton political campaign $$$$ donor; they email specific anti-Trump, pro-Hillary stuff to each other on taxpayer-funded, FBI time.

FBI agent edits FBI Directory Comely's original statement so it avoids criminally implicating Hillary Clinton in any email/server wrong-doing whatsoever.

FBI agent signs-off on beginning the now-infamous Trump/Russia investigation.

FBI agent then joins Special Prosecutor Robert Mueller's team of investigators investigating that Trump/Russia investigation he signed-off on for the FBI.

FBI agent interviews Trump-fired Michael Flynn regarding his role in said investigation. Flynn insists he never did a bunch of stuff (stuff that wasn't criminal in the first place).

Except Flynn did do that stuff which wasn't even criminal in the first place. Flynn is charged with lying to that FBI agent, and pleads guilty to it.

How coincidental would it be that FBI Deputy Director of Counter Intelligence Peter Strzok was the FBI agent listed in all those instances above, the same Peter Strzok whom the media reported a few months ago had "unexpectedly" stepped-away from the Trump/Russia investigation, the same Peter Strzok whom Mueller declined to Congress to reveal why he left, the same FBI agent all the above truth hadn't been known about until Congress-subpoenaed information, which the FBI/DOJ had previously denied existing, reveal it all?

How is that 3 separate persons of interest to FBI criminal investigations lied to the same FBI agent...

...but only 1 of them was charged?

And how can it even POSSIBLY be that there were no notes or recordings of that same FBI agent's criminal investigation interview with Hillary Clinton, a person that same FBI agent contributed thousands of $$ to the political campaign of?

How is that ex-FBI Director Comey didn't dismiss that same FBI agent for the same reasons Mueller found to "unexpectedly" dismiss him for?

And why did both the FBI/DOJ outright lie to a FOIA request that this information didn't exist at all?
 
How many more billions of US taxpayer bucks do you want to spend probing Clintons for crimes they didn't commit? Almost a billion wasted over the decades already, with nothing to show for it but Wee Willie's weenie lie. So all the investigators unleashed by Gup sharks since 1992 were bought or faking or incompetent, is that your line? Sad.

Tromp is owned by Putin. Team Tromp are going to jail or exile. Grab your popcorn and enjoy the show.
 
Allegedly, from newly released email communications FORCED by Congressional subpoenas, comes proof from FBI/DOJ fingertips that that infamous tarmac meet between Bubba and Obummer's AG was intended/supposed to be secret, that if not for the eagle eye/nose of a local reporter, the public would've never known of it.

:D

Lie to Feds - go to prison.

Feds lie to FOIA - not a problem - YET.

When the first leaked info of that intended secret meet did become public, FOIA requests to the FBI/DOJ asked for even more info about it; both outright lied and stated for the public record that no such info existed in their charge...

Until Congressional subpoenas then issued for the very same info produced a treasure trove of info proving both the FBI/DOJ intentionally lied to those FOIA requests and that the tarmac meet was supposed to be secret, and that both actively conspired to keep it as quiet as possible - even after it was already exposed.

What if it all starts unraveling on the progressive deep state? That Comey's FBI - under the authority of Lynch's DOJ - under the authority of Executive Obummer - purposely did everything they covertly thought they could get away with to politically protect Hillary Rodham Clinton, whose email escapades - which was the spark to this entire, completely politicized spectacle - are also now under comparable Congressional scrutiny?

What do they say about it's not the lie, it's the coverup.

So, what are you going to name yourself next, Eeyore? :D
 
Back
Top