Harvey Weinstein

Spoken like someone who needs to pay for sex.

This is one of your areas of expertise?

We look forward to one day learning you've become a Chicago gun violence statistic.


I disagree. He doesn't sound a thing like Ishmael OR Vetteman.

Nyuk, nyuk.

Seems to me any Feminist would agree with the thinking that a woman who chooses to trade in her appearance and sexuality may do so.
 
Last edited:
So, you lost me with your first post being only about "liberals", but I read in, until you posted this utter pile of crap. ^^^^^

/threadfail

He had to keep trying. This is, I think, the tenth thread he's made about this. Apparently he's feeling ambitious.
 
He's a right-wing partisan hack who thinks that because Harvey is a Hollywood producer, he must be a Liberal and all Liberals blindly support one another. Like it makes the president any less of a pussy grabber.

In the case of Trump, that was another example, or more examples, of women using their sexuality as currency. He was not POTUS, but was big in entertainment, so women let him have his way. At least, that's what he says, and that was true in many other instances.

I'm not critical of the man in this regard. If anything, I'm envious of him for all the hot chicks who were available for his pleasure.
 
In the case of Trump, that was another example, or more examples, of women using their sexuality as currency. He was not POTUS, but was big in entertainment, so women let him have his way. At least, that's what he says, and that was true in many other instances.

I'm not critical of the man in this regard. If anything, I'm envious of him for all the hot chicks who were available for his pleasure.


Agreed. Most people here haven't been in a position of monetary influence with models/entertainers, so they have no actual experience in their ways.
 
I would imagine nearly all of the people in Weinstein's position are like him; so why all the hubbub now? And what of the rest of them? Corey Feldman said most of them are pederasts- why no focus on that and only harassment? And why just this guy?
 
He's a right-wing partisan hack who thinks that because Harvey is a Hollywood producer, he must be a Liberal and all Liberals blindly support one another. Like it makes the president any less of a pussy grabber.

I'm pretty sure most people who have any idea who Harvey Weinstein is in politics think he's a liberal because he supports liberal candidates and causes. That tends to suggest he's a liberal. His occupation has nothing to do with it.
 
He had to keep trying. This is, I think, the tenth thread he's made about this. Apparently he's feeling ambitious.

This case certainly is certainly thread worthy.

I'm not at all surprised that this has nothing to do with sexual assault, and everything to do with a man using what these women went through to "score points".
 
This case certainly is certainly thread worthy.

I'm not at all surprised that this has nothing to do with sexual assault, and everything to do with a man using what these women went through to "score points".

Agreed.

And even then I share Funk's cynicism in that Weinstein pissed off the wrong person, read man, and was able to use this long held information to take him down.

I really don't have much optimism that this story will alter how power is exploited.
 
I would imagine nearly all of the people in Weinstein's position are like him; so why all the hubbub now? And what of the rest of them? Corey Feldman said most of them are pederasts- why no focus on that and only harassment? And why just this guy?

I doubt they would be pederasts, which would be men who are sexuality attracted to boys. Some would be, of course, but most would have the hots for girls in their middle or late teens, simply because most men are straight.
 
I'm pretty sure most people who have any idea who Harvey Weinstein is in politics think he's a liberal because he supports liberal candidates and causes. That tends to suggest he's a liberal. His occupation has nothing to do with it.

That's great but what does it have to do with all liberals universally supporting a rapist? Am I to assume that all republicans support Trump, the rapist?
 
If a woman want to use her sexuality as currency and a man buys what she's selling, neither party should be judged.

When the IRS starts investigating whether all the payoffs he's made over the years were deducted as business expenses, judgement will really come into play.
 
That's great but what does it have to do with all liberals universally supporting a rapist? Am I to assume that all republicans support Trump, the rapist?

It's not just "a rapist", it's the entire culture of sexual assaulting liberal Hollywood where this isn't any exception, it's the RULE.

There is no place on earth where sexuality is more corrupted than in LaLaLand, and gender doesn't matter at all to the liberals who totally rule it. If Caligula reincarnated 100x worse than he was before, no doubt his new reign would be over liberal Hollywood today.

Weinstein was permitted for decades to keep rising all the way to the top despite all the hideousness he committed. Right now there are countless others no different from him at all actively plying their despicable trades, too, with all those who kept quiet about Weinstein all those years keeping quiet about them now, too.

Hollywood sexual assaulting deviancy is nothing but a cesspool of liberal making, and there is absolutely no one or nothing else to blame about any of this than liberals themselves.
 
Because sexual assaults nevertheless happen in the work place, the home, on the streets or in, that liberal bastion, the military.

A person is sexually assualted every 98 seconds.

ETA:

I see Adrina already post about the culture at Faux News.
 
Last edited:
Because sexual assaults nevertheless happen in the work place, the home, on the streets or in, that liberal bastion, the military.

A person is sexually assualted every 98 seconds.

ETA:

I see Adrina already post about the culture at Faux News.

Apparently if we were to ask some posters here, sexual assault is strictly a liberal problem. :rolleyes:
 
The thread can't be more focused on "Harvey Weinstein", which naturally next leads to the specific environment in which Harvey Weinstein roved, liberal Hollywood, and "liberal" because it's impossible to argue that any significant degree of "conservative" exists in Hollywood truly at all.

Those in this thread not directly attacking Harvey Weinstein and liberal Hollywood ONLY, instead choosing to dissipate this truth only away from their liberalism in general, are simply guilty of the same diversionary liberal enabling that allowed Harvey Weinstein to rise and thrive in liberal Hollywood in the first place.

In fact, not specifically focusing on all the sexual assaulting that occurs hourly in liberal Hollywood today is exactly why that hideous issue will fade by next week from the deserved attention it's now receiving, enabling it to continue again totally unabated.
 
This thread is focused on everything but Weinstein.


I'm trying to have a rational discussion with wormfood, aren't I? :rolleyes:
 
There have been more calls for Democrats to denounce private citizen Harvey Weinstein than there ever were for Republicans to denounce the child molester they elected Speaker of the House.
 
Back
Top