What did we learn today?

Poetic Justice is getting that which you demand.


:cool:

One can imagine somebody like a Michael Chertoff gnawing his way through the Obama DOJ. Hysterical commies hugging autographed portraits of Che, asses torn and bloody, fleeing 950 Pennsylvania Avenue. Ah yes...:D
 
Have you seen the latest from Nate Silver on the state of the press?


It's fucking brutal.

Yup, and he's not the only one writing about it.

I read recently that the avg. age of the political press in DC is 28 years of age. Not many adults left in the room.

Ishmael
 
Because almost anything and everything is the press any more, I am not surprised that, in general, it is comprised of a lot of new hires straight out of the Progressive training grounds which used to be Universities.

Have you seen this?

http://www.americanthinker.com/arti...dependency_in_republicandominated_states.html

I find the point about brain drain to be very illuminating and instructive on how the nation has been divided and will stay divided. As I have learned the hard way this week, you simply cannot have any sort of a conversation with such elitist and bigoted minds and they are most certainly not interested in any conversation that does not reenforce their group bias and xenophobia towards those outside of their enclaves. I think a lot of the hate being directed at the heartland is from their converted sons and daughters like the individual who has found religion or kicked smoking...
 
On the March 8 Hannity, ex-intel office Tony Shaffer and ex-NSA official William Binney flatly stated (7:03) that the campaign hack of the Democratic National Committee was conducted through WikiLeaks not by the Russians but by ex-NSA personnel disgusted with the Clintons. They masked their operation by creating what intel types call a “false flag”: disguising the real source. The false flag in this DNC hack was Russia, implanted by “ATP 2829” malware. Our intel only shows that a Russian tool was used, not that Russia did it. Shaffer conceded he does not have proof, but he talked with insiders, whose reliability he clearly considered sufficient to make these allegations on the air. Shaffer added that he shared this information with reporters, none of whom expressed interest in the matter.

https://spectator.org/seven-days-in-may-lite-killing-trump-softly/

;) ;)
 

If you recall I posited just that sort of scenario when all of that BS hit the press. Anyone with the tools to perform that hack would have the expertise to cover their tracks.......thoroughly.

The notion that NSA or former NSA employees were behind the hack should come as no surprise to anyone, or at least shouldn't be beyond the scope of their curiosity. Because the NSA DOES 'listen in' on conversations with foreign officials it stands to reason that many folks in the NSA were in the know concerning any activities that the Clinton State Dept. were up to, including those tacitly quo quid pro deals with friends of the Clinton's. (Covered in one of your previous links. (Podesta et al))

Ishmael
 
Exactly, but no one was screaming for an investigation of her the way they are doing now about Trump (or, at least, were). No, instead it was just a partisan witch hunt to suggest that Hillary was being bribed by foreign, and domestic, entities...
 
Exactly, but no one was screaming for an investigation of her the way they are doing now about Trump (or, at least, were). No, instead it was just a partisan witch hunt to suggest that Hillary was being bribed by foreign, and domestic, entities...

It was/is all about de-legitimizing Trump. After all, Hillary really won the election.....right?

Ishmael
 
It was/is all about de-legitimizing Trump. After all, Hillary really won the election.....right?

Ishmael

*chuckle*

Did Bernie meet with the Russians?

Maybe he's the "real" President after all since the Democrat Primaries were rigged and they cannot prove it wasn't the Russians...
 
*chuckle*

Did Bernie meet with the Russians?

Maybe he's the "real" President after all since the Democrat Primaries were rigged and they cannot prove it wasn't the Russians...

Seems as if the democrats are the only ones allowed to 'rig' elections. It's for the greater good ya know?

Ishmael
 
It somewhat puts all of their bleating about love of Democracy and the will of the majority into its proper perspective...

;) ;)
 
“Noted!” Schumer said, “Now, we will hear from our Native American caucus."

“I hate Trump more than I hate John Wayne!” roared Elizabeth Warren. The crowd murmured at her impactful premise.

...

“As my people often say, during times of trouble, the Great Bear Spirit inspires braves and squaws alike to resist and…persist.” She winked. The crowd clapped politely.

Chuck Schumer rolled his eyes. How long was Big Chief Talking Bull going to milk that line? Plus, he still resented having to show solidarity by getting a “She Persisted” tramp stamp.

https://townhall.com/columnists/kur...pool-of-failure-and-fail-at-that-too-n2297884
 
It's been deeply divided before and the cycle will continue. It is the hubris of each generation to believe that they are in unique times. It is even worse now during a time when we do not teach to the greatness of our nation's history, but rather to its flaws. For you see, the modern progressive sees the past as an indictment, the present as unjust and the future will be perfected, but only if we drop all opposition to their utopian dreams. When we do not, they get pretty damned angry. Eventually, all their obstruction and complaining will get them back into power and they're going to enact their revenge on those that rejected them for Trump.
 
Where will all this ultimately lead?

The Dems control the house and senate, they pass stuff, the Reps now do, they repeal them, pass others.

This past election being so polarizing risks having an opposite adverse effect in 2018 and 2020.

Will we keep doing these cycles? Mista Spock, doesn't it blow dat wey?

The only other way to do it (without moving to a completely different constitutional system) would be one-party hegemony, like that of the PRI in Mexico for so many decades. Would that really be better, even if the dominant party were yours, which it won't be?
 
Back
Top