On nearly every issue, more Americans oppose Trump’s agenda than support it

4est_4est_Gump · Mar 13, 2017

Can we do with few less positions?

I think we can:

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog...s_than_33_assistant_secretaries_of_state.html

4est_4est_Gump · Mar 13, 2017

An inconvenient truth:

https://pjmedia.com/trending/2017/03/12/ivanka-trumps-clothing-line-scorching-hot-in-february/

From 550th to eleventh.

Rightguide · Mar 13, 2017

4est_4est_Gump said:
Can we do with few less positions?

I think we can:

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog...s_than_33_assistant_secretaries_of_state.html

There's a lot of undersecretaries at the Pentagon as well. Hopefully, this really will be the biggest drawdown in federal employment since the Truman era.

Rightguide · Mar 13, 2017

4est_4est_Gump said:
An inconvenient truth:

https://pjmedia.com/trending/2017/03/12/ivanka-trumps-clothing-line-scorching-hot-in-february/

From 550th to eleventh.

The most relevant inconvenient truth is the liberal media is becoming nothing more than a demonstration of impotence.

4est_4est_Gump · Mar 13, 2017

A new irrelevancy.

They are trending upwards in numbers as Democrats have found a new need for bias confirmation via television news...

*chuckle*

They won't get fooled again!

Good thing March Madness starts this week. I picking teams that have ORANGE as part of their school colors.

Rightguide · Mar 13, 2017

4est_4est_Gump said:
A new irrelevancy.

They are trending upwards in numbers as Democrats have found a new need for bias confirmation via television news...

*chuckle*

They won't get fooled again!

Good thing March Madness starts this week. I picking teams that have ORANGE as part of their school colors.

They supported Hillary and Trump gets elected. They came down on Ivanka and she comes out smelling like a rose. They love and support big gov't and American hates it. They hate guns, America loves guns. It goes on and on.

4est_4est_Gump · Mar 13, 2017

Mama's got a squeeze box!

Papa's got a brand new bag!

james_1957 · Mar 13, 2017

The polls?

Trump beat the Bush dynasty, the Clinton dynasty & the Obama dynasty.

pointless · Mar 13, 2017

so many disingenuous cunts, so little time.

so instead i'll go play videogames. morons who can't remember what actually happened in november aren't worth my time.

especially the cunts who cried about how unfair the electoral college was back in 2012 when they was ascared that the same thing that happened to clinton would happen to romney. i'm looking at you, fakeass billy jack.

4est_4est_Gump · Mar 13, 2017

You haven't a shred or scintilla of proof to your wild accusations.

4est_4est_Gump · Mar 13, 2017

Maybe we should be asking non-Americans:

...

"I've personally met with President Trump at Mar-a-Lago and the president has had two phone conversations with President Ghani [The president of Afghanistan]. One call was after he won the election and one after [Trump] became president. Before the calls, we were advised to keep conversations short because, we were told, Trump will not be interested in the details of the call and does not have a long attention span, so it would be pointless to have a long call*.

However, we were pleasantly surprised at how much time President Trump spent asking very informed questions. The first time the presidents spoke, the questions Trump asked impressed us. “How can you win in this fight [against terrorism]?” he asked. “What do you need to become financially independent?” and “How can American business invest in Afghanistan? How can we develop businesses and mining in your country?”

Trump would listen intently after each question, often asking follow-ups. Trump's second call with our president was even longer than the first. Asking these types of questions for our country is something the Obama administration never did. The Obama administration was the most academic administration we have ever had to deal with but the Trump administration has been the most thoughtful and intelligent.

Trump continually asked “How can you win? What does Afghanistan need to win?” in reference to our fight with terrorism. Trump wants to win. Sincerely. All the Obama administration wanted to do was not lose.

The Obama administration was hesitant with us. The enemy could sense that. When the Obama administration announced its plans to pull troops out of the region, they announced the exact date they would do it. All our enemies had to do was wait [Obama] out. They knew the date they had to hang on until — which gave them the will to fight. They used that time to recruit and build up resources.

Dr. Hamdullah Mohib
Independent Journal-Review

* Would that be the Obama Administration, mainly State, I would have to assume, trying to undermine the President-Elect?

IrezumiKiss · Mar 13, 2017

Until he does two straight terms with more than just tens of people coming out to see him every time he needs an ego boost, the only "dynasty" Lord Cheetos Shitstain beat is the one with Joan Collins and Linda Evans.

https://33.media.tumblr.com/3ad238a54c3f52d466776299562ebb55/tumblr_inline_nl3y4fEqwn1r5aulw.gif

an' if we're keeping it a buck, even that series' quality blows his current shitshow out the water on all metrics.

KingOrfeo · Mar 13, 2017

Rightguide said:
There's a lot of undersecretaries at the Pentagon as well. Hopefully, this really will be the biggest drawdown in federal employment since the Truman era.

And what makes you think the Pentagon has any more undersecretaries than it needs? A big military establishment can't function without a big civilian bureaucracy.

Rightguide · Mar 13, 2017

KingOrfeo said:
And what makes you think the Pentagon has any more undersecretaries than it needs?

Experience.

KingOrfeo · Mar 13, 2017

Rightguide said:
Experience.

You've worked in the Pentagon?

KingOrfeo · Mar 13, 2017

Rightguide said:
Hopefully, this really will be the biggest drawdown in federal employment since the Truman era.

That happened because WWII was over and all that wartime government apparatus was no longer (as) necessary. No analogous situation is now present.

Rightguide · Mar 13, 2017

KingOrfeo said:
That happened because WWII was over and all that wartime government apparatus was no longer (as) necessary. No analogous situation is now present.

It proved one thing, the gov't could fire ten million people and still survive while clearing the way for America to prosper.

BotanyBoy · Mar 13, 2017

KingOrfeo said:
No analogous situation is now present.

Sure it is, we have tons of bullshit government left over from eras bygone and laws too that could all be shit canned and or streamlined.

Question is will (R)'s ever do it or are they just going to jerk each other off trying to ban sex and drugs again in an attempt to put (D) back in control.

I'm betting the latter because that's exactly what it looks like they are doing.

KingOrfeo · Mar 13, 2017

Rightguide said:
It proved one thing, the gov't could fire ten million people and still survive while clearing the way for America to prosper.

America was able to prosper because it had the only major industrial infrastructure in the world that had not been damaged by the war, therefore the world was our market . . . for a while. No analogous situation is now present.

KingOrfeo · Mar 13, 2017

KingOrfeo said:
Based on new Quinnipiac poll.

That one is "Increasing federal spending on infrastructure."

Which is an important exception. The people really want that -- and probably would be willing to swallow a tax hike to pay for it. But Trump seems to think he can do it without raising taxes or ballooning the deficit.

KingOrfeo · Mar 13, 2017

BotanyBoy said:
Sure it is, we have tons of bullshit government left over from eras bygone and laws too that could all be shit canned and or streamlined.

Truman's downsizing had nothing to do with that.

BotanyBoy · Mar 13, 2017

KingOrfeo said:
Truman's downsizing had nothing to do with that.

I never said it did.

I just said we got plenty of garbage that could stand to be taken out.

KingOrfeo · Mar 13, 2017

BotanyBoy said:
I never said it did.

I just said we got plenty of garbage that could stand to be taken out.

Well, legislatures are always at work pruning outmoded laws. If one you think is outmoded is still on the books, there are compelling political reasons for that, it's not simply overlooked.

rocket_surgery · Mar 13, 2017

KingOrfeo said:
You've worked in the Pentagon?

Almost anyone who has been in the military can tell you that the Pentagon and everything associated with it is incredibly bloated. Probably half could be cut with little or no effect on the military itself.

KingOrfeo · Mar 13, 2017

rocket_surgery said:
Almost anyone who has been in the military can tell you that the Pentagon and everything associated with it is incredibly bloated. Probably half could be cut with little or no effect on the military itself.

Just because they can tell you that doesn't mean it's true. It might look that way to anyone dealing with the bureaucracy from outside it, but that does not make it so.

On nearly every issue, more Americans oppose Trump’s agenda than support it

Run Forrest! RUN!

Run Forrest! RUN!

Prof Triggernometry

Prof Triggernometry

Run Forrest! RUN!

Prof Triggernometry

Run Forrest! RUN!

Literotica Guru

¿por qué no?

Run Forrest! RUN!

Run Forrest! RUN!

Literotica Guru

Literotica Guru

Prof Triggernometry

Literotica Guru

Literotica Guru

Prof Triggernometry

Fuck Your Safe Space

Literotica Guru

Literotica Guru

Literotica Guru

Fuck Your Safe Space

Literotica Guru

Literotica Guru

Literotica Guru

Similar threads