So who's switching their vote away from Hillary?

Poll to come.

Ishmael

% of "switchers" who were never going to vote for her in the first place: high.

But you knew that already. Amateur hour.

Private poll. Get busy, queerbait.

RobDownSouth said:

Private poll. Get busy, queerbait.

Click to expand...

Bingo.

Ishmael said:

Poll to come.

Ishmael

Click to expand...

Where's the "I never thought about voting for Hillary in the first place" button.

I'm just glad that "Nunya Bums" is on the ballot here in Nevada because that's the only rational choice.

(PS I've already voted for "Nunya Bums" so there's no button that applies to me anyway.

I'd have to change all three votes.

Weird Harold said:

Where's the "I never thought about voting for Hillary in the first place" button.

Click to expand...

Intentionally omitted.

Without a "dolf" option, this pole is impotent.

WAIT!

Invalid. I meant the poll is invalid.

Weird Harold said:

Where's the "I never thought about voting for Hillary in the first place" button.

Click to expand...

Ishmael didn't want to confuse the Queerbait Invective Collective. Binary choices (yes/no, black/white) work best to achieve the desired outcome.

Weird Harold said:

Where's the "I never thought about voting for Hillary in the first place" button.

I'm just glad that "Nunya Bums" is on the ballot here in Nevada because that's the only rational choice.

(PS I've already voted for "Nunya Bums" so there's no button that applies to me anyway.

Click to expand...

Not interested in those that had their minds made up and are never switching.

I did think about the other options possible and discarded them. Just exploring the possible impact of the recent revelations.

Ishmael

Ishmael said:

Just exploring the possible impact of the recent revelations.

Ishmael

Click to expand...

No you aren't. You posted an anonymous poll.

Only problem is no one cares about your polls, old coot.

I never intended to cote for corruption and crony Capitalism...



*sniff* *sniff* I remember back when the typical Hillary voter was all about the hate for crony Capitalism, but now all that money lining up behind her, well that just proves how "trusted" she is by Capitalists...

I have to say: there are two gifs makers on this board: one being creepy as hell and the other being one anything but.

4est_4est_Gump said:

I never intended to cote for corruption and crony Capitalism...



*sniff* *sniff* I remember back when the typical Hillary voter was all about the hate for crony Capitalism, but now all that money lining up behind her, well that just proves how "trusted" she is by Capitalists...

Click to expand...

Had my usual breakfast today with teh usual cast of characters.

First point of 'inside' information is that the investigations, and there is more than one, have nothing to do with 'classified' information. Comey put that to bed back in July. The only ones beating that dead horse are the press and the Clinton campaign.

Second point is that Comey has 13 resignations sitting on his desk right now. Some from some very high level investigators. Investigators that should those resignation become public are going to go to the public. As we discussed not too long ago, the rebellion is not just with regards to Comey, but with the DOJ stonewalling the process.

The DOJ is citing the policy put in place by Holder concerning 'not effecting elections.' Fine, but at what point? Where is the threshold? Is murder the threshold? Rape? Petty crimes and misdemeanors? The point is that there are certain crimes that the public should be made aware of no matter where in any election cycle the evidence warrants an investigation. Holders policy prohibits any public disclosure of wrong doing, no matter what the nature of the wrong doing is. Fuck Holder and his policy. That's what I say, and it appears that many in the FBI are in agreement.

The press is steadfastly ignoring, or trying to, the fact that the 'Public Corruption' units of two major FBI offices are involved in this. And those people have nothing to do with 'classified' information.

Interestingly enough the results of the election will have no effect on the investigations. Hillary, should she be elected, can't stop them or even 'pardon' those involved, at least not until after they've been convicted. She can't even pardon herself. And as far as pardoning those convicted, some key players are going to be granted immunity for their testimony.

The whole affair is sadly hilarious. (pun intended)

Ishmael

In the past, people were willing to go to jail to protect the Clintons. So far DOJ has signaled that no one will be punished on its watch, so I have to wonder if there is any meaningful threat on the part of law enforcement for the inner circle.

Had this been the Republican candidate, there would be a daily howling for the sacking of his adopted second son, but in the case of Huma, who is just like a daughter to Hillary, there is total silence other than stories about the equestrian sex therapy of Carlos Danger. She has been put on ignore by the press in order to keep her safe to serve in the White House.

Scooter Libby <> Sandy "Socks" Berger

Goes with what I just read :

Julian Assange:

"My analysis is that Trump would not be permitted to win. Why do I say that? Because he has had every establishment off his side. Trump does not have one establishment, maybe with the exception of the Evangelicals, if you can call them an establishment.

Banks, intelligence, arms companies, foreign money, etc. are all united behind Hillary Clinton. And the media as well. Media owners, and the journalists themselves.”

https://www.rt.com/news/365299-assange-pilger-saudi-clinton/

RoryN said:

...

Click to expand...

Nigger!

4est_4est_Gump said:

In the past, people were willing to go to jail to protect the Clintons. So far DOJ has signaled that no one will be punished on its watch, so I have to wonder if there is any meaningful threat on the part of law enforcement for the inner circle.

Had this been the Republican candidate, there would be a daily howling for the sacking of his adopted second son, but in the case of Huma, who is just like a daughter to Hillary, there is total silence other than stories about the equestrian sex therapy of Carlos Danger. She has been put on ignore by the press in order to keep her safe to serve in the White House.

Scooter Libby <> Sandy "Socks" Berger

Click to expand...

Talking about Sandy, did he rise from the dead to cause that drive to disappear from the archives?

Yes, the DOJ is stonewalling, but they can't stop those agents from going public. And they know that as well. So they're busting their ass trying to contain the situation as best they can, which is to say ham-handedly and with threats.

The last election this dirty was in 1828 when Andrew Jackson, an outsider, was subjected to the same invective as Trump is. The opposition also viscously attacked Jackson's wife, who died before the inauguration. Jackson never forgave them for that and cleaned house, thoroughly.

Time for another house cleaning.

Ishmael

Ishmael said:

The last election this dirty was in 1828 when Andrew Jackson, an outsider, was subjected to the same invective as Trump is. The opposition also viscously attacked Jackson's wife, who died before the inauguration. Jackson never forgave them for that and cleaned house, thoroughly.

Click to expand...

"Viscously attacked" his wife? Did they drown her in molasses?


No surprise to see you're a vote for fascism; you've made your preferences crystal clear for years.

Real_American21 said:

Nigger!

Click to expand...

LOL!

Desperation at an all-time high, eh?

hashtag45 said:

Goes with what I just read :

Julian Assange:

"My analysis is that Trump would not be permitted to win. Why do I say that? Because he has had every establishment off his side. Trump does not have one establishment, maybe with the exception of the Evangelicals, if you can call them an establishment.

Banks, intelligence, arms companies, foreign money, etc. are all united behind Hillary Clinton. And the media as well. Media owners, and the journalists themselves.”

https://www.rt.com/news/365299-assange-pilger-saudi-clinton/

Click to expand...

What he said after that was more important when it comes to the current situation and the Foundation; She, Bill and the Foundation took money from the financiers of ISIS...

Ishmael said:

Talking about Sandy, did he rise from the dead to cause that drive to disappear from the archives?

Yes, the DOJ is stonewalling, but they can't stop those agents from going public. And they know that as well. So they're busting their ass trying to contain the situation as best they can, which is to say ham-handedly and with threats.

The last election this dirty was in 1828 when Andrew Jackson, an outsider, was subjected to the same invective as Trump is. The opposition also viscously attacked Jackson's wife, who died before the inauguration. Jackson never forgave them for that and cleaned house, thoroughly.

Time for another house cleaning.

Ishmael

Click to expand...

Yes, a grand housekeeping is in order, but I don't think Trump owns any livestock.

hashtag45 said:

Goes with what I just read :

Julian Assange:

"My analysis is that Trump would not be permitted to win. Why do I say that? Because he has had every establishment off his side. Trump does not have one establishment, maybe with the exception of the Evangelicals, if you can call them an establishment.

Banks, intelligence, arms companies, foreign money, etc. are all united behind Hillary Clinton. And the media as well. Media owners, and the journalists themselves.”

https://www.rt.com/news/365299-assange-pilger-saudi-clinton/

Click to expand...

A link from Russia Today.

I think we're all glad you're a pretend non-American.

Wrong Element said:

"Viscously attacked" his wife? Did they drown her in molasses?


No surprise to see you're a vote for fascism; you've made your preferences crystal clear for years.

Click to expand...

Fascism? As opposed to what?

You jerks have trotted out the same invective's for years now. Homophobic, racist, misogynist, fascist, what else ya got? Oh, xenophobic, almost forgot that one. AND, it's now 'extreme' to want to adhere to the Constitution.

For the most part the left has proven itself quote incapable of civil discourse. Hasn't exhibited that capability for damn near 3 decades now.

But I'll give you the opportunity to prove me wrong. Just what has Trump done or said that would warrant the term 'Fascist?'

Ishmael

Ishmael said:

Fascism? As opposed to what?

You jerks have trotted out the same invective's for years now. Homophobic, racist, misogynist, fascist, what else ya got? Oh, xenophobic, almost forgot that one. AND, it's now 'extreme' to want to adhere to the Constitution.

For the most part the left has proven itself quote incapable of civil discourse. Hasn't exhibited that capability for damn near 3 decades now.

But I'll give you the opportunity to prove me wrong. Just what has Trump done or said that would warrant the term 'Fascist?'

Ishmael

Click to expand...

Have you paid attention to the tone of the last week, week and a half? As I just pointed out in another thread, having already won the election, the tone is not that of joyous celebration but rather that of distasteful disgust.