Recidiva
Harastal
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2005
- Posts
- 89,726
We can agree to disagree.
We have different points of view and see the people in the government differently. That is why there is an election. I will deal with the next four years as best I can.
I do not know why you think I have no desire to be part of a society....I do not believe I ever said that. I don't agree with the entitlement mentality, but that does not make me oppose to society.
Also not sure why you assume I am not a decent human being.....other than I disagree with your views.
...anyway.....we can just agree to disagree.
Yes. I was pretty sure before I started this conversation and as I continued this conversation, that I knew I could disagree and agree to disagree without internet fairy punishment.
Thanks for the permission? You may feel free to not give me further permission as I understood the concept all along.
You might very well be a decent human being in certain circles. You appear to be tribal. Your group, your religion, your people, your party, certainly they deserve humane treatment.
But it does appear you write anybody off if they're "liberal" (whatever that means, you use it like a dirty word) or someone without proper documentation, clearly government workers are all that is evil. Then they're all liars and users and deserve condemnation and scorn.
But if you sight unseen stereotype groups and people and have rules about how you shouldn't be nice to them because somehow they'll do you harm if you manage to be nice to them...yeah, I'd be wary of your willingness to extend your decency across certain boundaries. You'll be nice to someone after you've properly categorized them, taken the weight of their soul and decided they are worth your attention.
Again...not quite what Jesus said to do. You've strangled yourself up in your own contradictions and you're a hypocrite in writing. I don't know anything about reality though. That's my impression.