LJ_Reloaded
バクスター の
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2010
- Posts
- 21,217
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's not hate, it's love for the working class that makes me see the truth, that people like you are little more than mindless servile minions.You'd think this much hate would get exhausting after awhile.
Then get lost, minion. You're the idiot who started protesting when I defined what a familiar is - maybe it's because it pegged you on the forehead?Dude, I am part of that working poor you're talking about so get off the fucking moral high horse. You demonize everyone who doesn't think exactly like you. I get it, you're not interested in having a conversation, you just need to scream at people.
Have at it. I won't bother trying to talk you anymore.
I thought you said "Have at it. I won't bother trying to talk you anymore." What happened to that?You think I'm a Republican. I see. In your world there's only ever two answers. You and Bonnie are perfect pair it seems.
Plutocrats as in the wealthy elite who support the plutocracy.By Plutocrat, do you mean the Philosopher King, Merit-over-genetics system? Because I can totally get behind that.
Other then that, I don't understand the point of this thread... go into a little more detail, if you could. The republicans are helping the Philosopher Kings? I don't understand what you're saying.
I'm broke as fuck to; if that helps. So totally a minion. I wanna get a "Hench 4 life" tat like 24.
Plutocrats as in the wealthy elite who support the plutocracy.
Familiars, as in minions, as in the lower caste working class and upper middle class/affluent sheep who defend the emerging global plutocracy.
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/plutocrat
plu·toc·ra·cy (pl-tkr-s)
n. pl. plu·toc·ra·cies
1. Government by the wealthy.
2. A wealthy class that controls a government.
3. A government or state in which the wealthy rule.
Interesting take. Revolutions DO run a high risk of exchanging one plutocrat for another. We still do have clear choices, though - people like Bernie Sanders or Barney Frank are known for fighting the plutocracy.Oh, well then no shit, dude, we call that capitalism. It's great if you're winning. It sucks if you're not. It doesn't really need to be stated; it's like doing algebra and accidentally writing down a=a.
That's why the working poor don't care about revolution. All it's going to mean is a switch-up of our masters. Who gives a shit?
Interesting take. Revolutions DO run a high risk of exchanging one plutocrat for another. We still do have clear choices, though - people like Bernie Sanders or Barney Frank are known for fighting the plutocracy.
A worker's party would also be another path to take.