Psycho-Babbling Obama

miles said:

Obama made a complete ass of himself. The man is an incompetent fraud. Anybody who still defends him has shit for brains.

Click to expand...

C'mon Miles, call the president a nigger. You know you want to.

Doooooooo it, Miles. Unburden yourself. You've built up this animosity towards the man for over two years.

Democratic Party Civil War – It is ON!




The White House Insider reports from months ago indicated the kind of infighting within the Democratic Party the media is now reporting on. Is a 2012 primary challenge to Obama soon to follow?




Months ago, when a certain Washington DC political Insider explained how it was not the Republicans who were in a state of chaotic infighting, but rather the Democrats, some scoffed at the notion. The media was at the time, working overtime to describe the Republican Party as the one “fighting for its soul”, and dealing with an in-party “civil war”. It would now appear those many media reports were wrong – and the DC Insider reports proven quite right.


Today we see the media now indicating just how contentious things have gotten between the Obama White House and Congressional Democrats. One member of Congress was even said to have uttered, “F-CK the president.” Even by the often belligerent behaviors of D.C. politics, to hear such an open declaration against a sitting president from a member of that president’s own political party is rather remarkable, and a clear testament to just how contentious the situation has become within the Democratic Party.


Just yesterday we learned that former Alaskan Democrat Senator Mike Gravel is seriously considering a run against Obama in 2012. On again and off again Green Party candidate Ralph Nader is now openly expressing a need to run against Obama. To have such a growing chorus of opposition coming against a sitting president from members of his own progressive-political spectrum has to be both alarming and confounding to a White House having not yet completed its first two years of governing.


With Republicans taking control of the House in 2011, and Congressmen such as Darell Issa indicating sweeping investigations into potential wrongdoings by the Obama White House are to come shortly thereafter, President Obama will be facing attack from both Democrats and Republicans. There is no indication Obama has the personal or political strength to successfully withstand such a challenge, particularly if the media begins to join in on the chorus of “F-CK the president.”


Obama’s White House staff has deserted him. Now too have members of his own Democratic Party. It is enough to make one almost feel sorry for the guy.

Almost…


Nah....

The Washington Insider's credibility is further confirmed by Gibbs' departure.

Some previous quotes regarding same:


VJs role has increased dramatically in recent weeks even more than it already was. Axelrod diminished. Also told Gibbs very much out of favor with M.O. may be gone soon. Developing.



One last question. Who is the next to leave the White House? You correctly predicted Summers and Emanuel before anyone else. Can you give me another prediction on who the next administration figure who is on the way out?

Sure – but there is going to be a whole rash of departures coming up you know. Top to bottom.
Gibbs. Yeah – the fat fuckhead Gibbs is gone. And good riddance.




We hear Robert Gibbs might be the new DNC Chairperson. What about …(interrupts)

NO. That is not going to happen. No way in hell. Gibbs heading the DNC? He can to to hell. No way we will let that happen.

He’s a very believable guy, right? A real class act. No way the White House could have chosen a better guy for the job…I know Robert Gibbs. I worked with Robert Gibbs during the 2008 campaign. Spoke with him personally from time to time. Something has happened to Gibbs. I don’t know what exactly, but the man has completely lost his moral compass. Or, he never had one and he just fooled some of us. And here’s a bit of news for you, something I’m pretty sure will put you ahead of the mainstream media yet again – Robert Gibbs is soon to be gone from his current position at the White House. Very soon.

Resigning, quitting, being replaced – whatever the spin is put on it the result is the same, Robert Gibbs is OUT as the White House Press Secretary. I have confirmed that myself. And good riddance. To put him as the daily face of the White House was terribly misguided. Absolutely the wrong choice as Press Secretary.



Question: Obama/Clinton Press Conference. Thoughts?

LOL! I don’t have enough time in the day to give you all my thoughts on that! As I told you earlier, Clinton was very happy following that press conference. It sent some serious rumbles through the party structure. And here is what is being under reported. It wasn’t so much how good Clinton was but how bad Obama was. Bill Clinton was being Bill Clinton, and nobody does that kind of thing better than he does. But seeing Obama leave that stage for a Xmas party?????? That was just crazy stuff wasn’t it? If Obama didn’t still somehow enjoy having most the media working to protect him that kind of thing might have just finished him right there.

And you were right when you asked about how he treated Robert Gibbs. To be that dismissive of your Press Sec. to dismiss him as “Gibbs” to the press. Wow. There’s so much to read between the lines on what Obama showed us that day, and none of it is good for Obama. I’ve been saying it to you for a while now. The guy is cracking up. Nobody who watches that press conference can believe otherwise. It wasn’t just bad. It was HORRIBLE. How many times has he said that turning the economy around is important? Jobs are critical? Etc???? And so he meets with a former Pres. to talk tax rates that impact every American and leaves the press conference regarding that meeting after a few minutes??????? I actually felt bad for Gibbs, and that is saying something for me. The damage control for that mess must have been off the charts. Gibbs is gone soon though. Taken longer than I had thought. Jarrett wants him gone. She has effectively taken over WH at this point. AND she is behind much of the anti-Rahm movement in Chicago. Her hands are all over it. Bitch.

More From The White House Insider:
Obama is Clueless. Totally Clueless




A surprise message from our D.C. Insider reveals an Obama White House completely unprepared for the events in Egypt, and increasingly fearful of Obama’s chances for re-election in 2012.



Had to send you this quick message. Feel free to publish all of it if you wish.

First, I am so disappointed in the response by Obama White House to the crisis in Egypt. White House was caught completely off guard on this one despite indications they were informed of just such a scenario a number of times over the past year or so. They ignored the warnings. When the protests started did you notice the confused messaging from the administration? Hillary says one thing. Biden says another thing. Obama says basically nothing.

These are the situations where an American president can either rise to the occasion and show strength and wisdom or where they appear weak and uncertain. I don’t need to explain to you what our current president did. If this goes badly, and it appears it very well could, American interests in the region will be placed in very grave danger. The parallels to Carter are stunning. Oh how I miss the days when the party was led by the likes of Scoop. I fear the mishandling of the Egypt situation is going to result in a total chaos in that country soon.


Obama is clueless. Totally clueless. I am not talking a little out of step here. I am talking the man has no idea what is going on around him. This is not coming from me. I am relaying it from some still around him on a regular basis. These people are getting increasingly concerned over just how “out of it”, that is the phrase repeated to me, Obama has become. His primary focus is now getting elected in ‘12. Everything else has been given over to Jarrett and her group. Everything.

The president has no interest in policy. None. No interest in working legislation. None. No interest in forging a specific agenda. None. He is being told what he needs to say and that is it. That is the extent of his interest. “Just make it look good.” Exact words right there. President Obama is obsessed 24/7 with just “looking good”. If something goes well, he gets happy and outgoing. If something makes him look badly, he lashes out and pouts. The man is bouncing off both of those extremes even more now than he used to and it appears to be getting worse and worse. The word “manic” is being used more and more regarding his moods these days.



FYI there was a closed door meeting recently under the guise of discussions on Egypt. That meeting did not involve Egypt much if at all. This information is relayed second hand but I believe it to be completely reliable. Source told that meeting was run by Jarrett from start to end. Obama said very little. Asked no questions.

The primary focus was how to protect Obamacare so it was not a “liability” in 2012 campaign. White House already spending significant time/resources preparing legal argument for the Supreme Court case that is coming.

Second focus was apparently “birther” related. Jarrett expressed concern over possible newly passed eligibility requirements in states. If only one or two states clarify eligibility in order to run for office, White House will simply use those states as examples of “anti-Obama racism”. They would likely not win the electorals in those states regardless, but could use the scenario to gain sympathy and support over the challenge from other moderate states. This is the tactic Jarrett and crew have prepared. She is worried though that if more than one or two states challenge the president’s eligibility, the issue would turn against them. Measures are being taken to make certain that does not happen. What those measures are, I don’t know at this point.

Oh, and while discussion over eligibility was underway, Obama sat motionless. He said nothing. That strikes me as pretty damn odd don’t you think? People are discussing whether or not you are actually eligible to run for re-election in 2012 and you don’t say a word on the subject? “He just sat there with a weird little smile and didn’t say anything.” Go ahead and print that quote word for word.

Others are now willing to let their observations be more known. Concern for the country is now winning over concern for their own political interests. Finally.



As stated before, Geithner is leaving.
That was repeated to me again this past week.

More to come soon.

I want to point you on something about Jarrett if you don’t mind.

She was at a recent WH/business leader thing. She WAS the White House at this meeting. Obama was there but said little after the intros. Jarrett spoke almost all the policy and the push for organized labor was HUGE by her at this meeting. The WH needs business to help out if they are to get a 2nd term. They have to admit that now. So what is going on is simple bribery. We are talking billions and billions here to come via the health bill requirements and tax code and other “perks”. It was a strong arm attempt that appeared almost fully coordinated by Jarrett.

I don’t believe Obama even understands the process here. He is being told what to say, how to react, etc. That’s not new, but on this it’s even more so than before.

Jarrett is running the show, with input from First Lady. Those two have formed quite a formidable team inside WH.

Anyway, what I want to tell you specifically on this meeting was that after it finished up, Jarrett came out to speak with media. CNBC I believe. She gives a rundown on meeting as the “President said this. President said that.” Making it appear Obama was up to speed on every question posed to her by CNBC. IT WAS ALL A LIE. Obama hardly spoke at that meeting. As I said, Jarrett did almost all the talking for the WH. And regarding those specific questions being asked to Jarrett – some of them NEVER CAME UP IN THE MEETING. She was LYING over and over again during that brief interview. And she was taking some of her own responses in the meeting and then saying “The president said this”. Obama didn’t say any of that. Jarrett basically admitted on camera she is the president. The two are one and the same. Jarrett is Obama’s brain. It’s her WH now full on.

There is nobody left in the West Wing to counter her agenda. And her agenda is almost 100% labor unions. Not the kind of support I’m familiar with and have worked with. Something else. Something far bigger. Watch that. There is something going on there. Unions are blasting Rahm in Chicago. Those strings lead right back to Jarrett.

Sorry for the rant on that one. Not one of your questions but that meeting and the Jarrett interview was overlooked by most. Wanted to bring it to your attention.

Repost from December 28



Valerie Jarrett’s Plans for Obama in 2011


President Obama’s closest and most powerful political adviser plans to increasingly move Obama out of the Oval Office – and perhaps out of the way?


http://s3.amazonaws.com/readers/2010/12/28/091121valerieap392regular_1.jpg



The latest rumors coming from inside The Beltway tell of top Obama administration adviser Valerie Jarrett, having successfully solidified her power within the Oval Office, giving indications President Obama will be spending even less time at the White House and more time in campaign mode in 2011. It has been repeated often that Obama cares far less for the job of governing than he does campaigning to govern, and it now appears Jarrett is going to give him ample time to do just that.


It is said Jarrett has convinced the president that much of the difficulties that led to Obama’s falling approval numbers among Americans since being elected in 2008 was that the president was not visible enough.

Many even within the president’s own party likely feel such a claim is rather absurd given Obama’s seemingly unending television appearances and near non-stop campaigning throughout much of 2009 and 2010, as well as numerous (and costly) trips abroad for both himself and First Lady Michelle Obama, but it would appear Jarrett now wants even less of Obama around the White House in 2011.

This past weekend Jarrett told Meet the Press the president intends to be engaging the American people far more in the coming year. In an example of unintended irony, Jarrett disclosed that the president had told her just prior to leaving for vacation in Hawaii that when he gets back from vacation he wants to really figure out how to spend less time in Washington DC.

There also appears to be a disconnect within the Obama West Wing, with Press Secretary Robert Gibbs recently stating there will be few staff leaving the Obama White House in 2011. (An interesting comment given the already significant exodus of staff that took place in 2010, as well as his own imminent departure in 2011.) Counter to Gibb’s recent assertions, DC Insiders are giving strong indications a significant shift is coming within the administration. Just this week a strong rumor of Hillary Clinton’s departure as from the State Department was bantered about. It has already been confirmed David Axelrod and Robert Gates are making quick exits away from the Obama White House in the coming weeks and months.

Valerie Jarrett then remains the seeming de facto President, particularly if President Obama is intent, as his own words appear to confirm, to campaign rather than govern througout 2011. Jarrett’s now open support for Obama’s absence from the White House would appear to substantiate the claims by certain DC Insiders that she is in fact, the real power within the administration. A related story tells of a meeting between Hillary Clinton and Jarrett earlier in the year in which Jarrett demanded to know of Clinton’s intentions in 2012. What Clinton specifically told Jarrett is not entirely known – but the relationship between the two powerful women has apparently become increasingly wary, with Jarrett constantly reminding President Obama the former First Lady cannot be trusted.

As for the President? He appears content with the Jarrett plan of less hands on governing and more travels outside of Washington DC, leaving the political heavy lifting to those more willing to do so. In effect, America has a president already campaigning for a second term in a job he increasingly appears not to want.

Strange days indeed…

Getting back to these excerpts:

MeeMie said:

His primary focus is now getting elected in ‘12. Everything else has been given over to Jarrett and her group. Everything.

FYI there was a closed door meeting recently under the guise of discussions on Egypt. Source told that meeting was run by Jarrett from start to end. Obama said very little. Asked no questions.

Click to expand...

Consider Jarrett's background, along with her current influence over Obama, coupled with Obama's Muslim roots, and understand how the Islamic slant is strong in the White House.

Valerie Jarrett is a member of African-American and Chicago royalty. But her story and her life begin in the Middle East, not the Midwest. She was born in 1956 in Shiraz, Iran, about 570 miles south of Tehran. She refers to herself as an American-Iranian. It is my understanding that she holds dual citizenship. She is now Obama's nanny and puppeteer.

Valerie Jarrett Addresses the Islamic Society of North America.
President Obama’s outreach to Muslims, Senior Advisor to the President Valerie Jarrett spoke at the Islamic Society of North America's 46th Annual Convention. In her remarks, Jarrett spoke of the importance of President Obama’s Cairo speech, she quoted the President:

"Since our founding, American Muslims have enriched the United States. They have fought in our wars, served in government, stood for civil rights, started businesses, taught at our universities, excelled in our sports arenas, won Nobel prizes, built our tallest buildings..."

http://i30.tinypic.com/am8n5j.jpg



"Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness"

Can anything be more antithetical to Islam?

MeeMie said:

Second focus was apparently “birther” related. Jarrett expressed concern over possible newly passed eligibility requirements in states. If only one or two states clarify eligibility in order to run for office, White House will simply use those states as examples of “anti-Obama racism”.

Click to expand...

Recognize that tactic?

I’ts amazing and sad how many people scream “racist” and other derrogatory terms when faced with opposition to Obama and loonies anti-American rhetoric.

The color of one’s skin does not guarantee leadership, integrity, honesty or character. In Obama's case it has been used as a tool to silence his critics.

At least now we know that making "racist" charges was a planned strategy by this administration to deflect from actual answers to questions and criticism.

Be aware of its ongoing use and scoff at the strategic deflection.




...

Obama's beliefs, demonstrated through his history, coupled with Jarrett's influence, explains his stance supporting the Muslim Brotherhood's overtake of Egypt's government.


When Obama was a senator he visited his father’s home country and was calling for the people to revolt against their government. That’s a matter of public record.


Jul 8, 2008:
Senator Obama plotting with members of his tribe an overthrow of the Kenyan government.

Obama-supported, pro-Sharia Kenyan Prime Minister Raila Odinga. Obama opposed our American ally, President Kibaki, and supported his pal, Raila Odinga, who used rape as a weapon. Odinga tore through the country using murder and rape as his weapons of choice. Justice Minister Martha Karua said that Odinga's group (Orange Democratic Movement) had planned to carry out systematic ethnic cleansing.

Odinga's 'opposition party' was opposed to democracy and free elections, and refused to accept the result of the national election. Raila Odinga rejected a presidential invitation for talks. Instead, he hoped to sow the seeds of violent civil war.

Odinga had signed a Memorandum of Understanding with the Muslim community of Kenya to institute sharia law should he win.

The deadly combination of Odinga's blood strikes against the people of Kenya and Obama's tacit support led to a "power sharing deal" that resulted in Rail Odinga being named Prime Minister. And this unholy alliance brought sharia law to Kenya, the once shining beacon of democracy on the dark continent.

Senator Obama funneled USAid money to Kenya for the purpose of encouraging abortion. He assisted his Cousin Odinga by campaigning for him while on a visit to Kenya in his Official Capacacity as a US Senator.

This is a Violation of US LAW which assisted in the Deaths of 1,333 Kenyan Citizens and dislacation of 350,000 others. It is illegal, by US Statute under 18 USC, Part 1, Chapter 115, Sec.2381 to give aid and comfort to our enemies. To do so is treason. Odinga is directly associated with the people who bombed two US Embassies. One in Tanzania and one in Nairobi. Obama supported this terrorist Odinga.


Odinga Loses
Raila Odinga, Obama’s cousin, lost the presidential election in Kenya. In true Marxist fashion, Odinga rallied his Luo followers in western Kenya, ordering them to the streets, demanding a new election -- and the violence commenced.

In classic Marxist tradition, Obama's Kenyan 1st cousin, Raila Odinga, accusing President Mwai Kibaki of stealing the Dec. 27 election, "Kibaki must step down or there must be a re-election -- in this I will not be compromised. You cannot steal my cow, and I catch you red-handed, and then expect me to share the milk because the cow is mine."

More than 1,000 people, mostly Kikuyu Christians, have been killed, and 300,000 others have been forced from their homes by Odinga's followers -- this from a guy who made a deal to install an Islamic government in Kenya.


Islam had picked Raila to win. The Evangelical Alliance of Kenya has posted on its website a photograph copy of a Memorandum of Understanding, dated and signed on August 29, 2007, between Raila Odinga and Shiekh Abdullah Abdi, chairman of the National Muslim Leaders Forum of Kenya.

Here is a summary on the agreement which was signed:

• It pledges the support of Kenyan Moslems for Raila’s election. In return, as President of Kenya, Raila agrees to 14 actions, listed a) through n) on page two.

• Within 6 months re-write the Constitution of Kenya to recognize Shariah as the only true law sanctioned by the Holy Quran for Muslim declared regions.

• Within one year facilitate the establishment of a Shariah court in every Kenyan divisional headquarters. [Note: everywhere in Kenya, not just in "Muslim declared regions."]

• Popularize Islam, the only true religion… by ordering every primary school in Kenya in the regions to conduct daily Madrassa classes.

• Impose a total ban on open-air gospel crusades by worshippers of the cross…

• Outlaw gospel programs… on KBC, the National Broadcaster.

• Impose a total ban on the public consumption of alcoholic beverages…

• Impose an immediate ban on women’s public dressing styles that are considered immoral and offensive to the Muslim faith…




Obama Illegally Campaigns In Africa

During this visit, Obama's Criticism Irks Kenyan Government. Government Says Obama Is A Stooge For Political Opposition

http://www.theobamafile.com/_images/ObamaOdingaSupporter.jpg

There are signs of tension between Sen. Barack Obama and African leaders. On Monday, Obama stepped up his criticism of government corruption in Kenya.

At the University of Nairobi, the senator offered more pointed criticism, something he's done almost every day since arriving last week. After remaining largely silent, the government of President Mwai Kibaki is beginning to respond, suggesting that Obama may have fallen under the spell of opposition leader Raila Odinga, Obama's cousin.

Odinga, is a member of Obama's ancestral tribe, the Luo, and a Muslim. He is the son of Senior’s sister, a direct first cousin and nephew of Obama's father.

A potential presidential candidate himself, Odinga's been at Obama's elbow here fairly often and is a member of the Obama family's Luo tribe.

"Sen. Obama has to look at critically about where he's receiving his advice from," said government spokesman Dr. Alfred Mutua. "Just because somebody, somewhere wants to run for president and is using Sen. Obama as his stooge, as his puppet to be able to get to where he wants to get to."


Obama's involvement in Kenyan politics, whether tribal or religious, is bothersome.

Especially if it is both.

White House Insider:
Michelle Obama is Flat Out Lying



http://s3.amazonaws.com/readers/2011/02/10/cincothemayomakeup_1.jpg



Here is my take on the First Lady’s “Obama isn’t smoking anymore” comments this past week. Michelle Obama is flat out lying and this kind of lying has become terminal within the Obama White House.

Is that direct enough for you?

I know for a FACT the president did NOT quit smoking last year.

Knowing that leaves me with the question of why Michelle Obama goes out and makes such a statement. That is the question you should have been asking. So why does she lie about her husband’s smoking habit? Certainly she is aware others know she is lying. So why do it?


Now this entire subject might seem on the surface to be somewhat unimportant, right? President Obama smokes or doesn’t smoke, who cares. Ah, but now add the First Lady making the issue a public lie regarding the subject. Why do that?

One, I think this White House has become less and less concerned with the appearance of truth. They have already gotten away with so much, so many times, that they now are emboldened to say or do what they want even more, regardless of where the truth might fit in. Now THAT should be of great concern to everyone.

Second, and this is total speculation here on my part, that there is an ongoing dispute between the First Lady and the president over his “habits”, and she put out that public statement as some kind of passive aggressive power play. That is her motivation. I don’t want to start on the psychology of a wife who would do that to a husband, make his habits and struggles a matter of public record, but it is a weird thing to do don’t you think? Was the First Lady punishing the president? Hell if I know, but it was a weird thing to do because so many of us know that the president has not quit smoking since last year. And if the First Lady is so willing to lie about something so trivial as the president’s smoking habit, imagine what kind of other lies she is participating in. Or don’t imagine as frankly it might be just too fucking scary to consider.

• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •​

It was interesting to note that while receiving this most recent email from Insider regarding the First Lady “flat out lying” regarding Barack Obama’s smoking habit, Michelle Obama was on Good Morning America also declaring that the president does not dye his hair, despite ample evidence from numerous sources indicating otherwise.

And what then was the First Lady’s explanation as to the seemingly ever-changing Obama hair color? “Lighting.” Oh really?

This obvious lie once again demands the very question posed by Insider in this latest installment - why is the First Lady of the United States engaging in such obvious examples of untruths?

And if she is so willing to lie about such trivial matters as hair dye and a smoking habit, what far more important issues is this Obama White House willing to deceive Americans on?

• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •​

Now to something more directly political.

Received word that a rift is already developing between Valerie Jarrett and Bill D.

Daley is worried Obamacare will be too easily used against the president in 2012 and wants to make drastic alterations to the legislation by the end of this year so it can be sold as more popular than it currently is. Jarrett is digging in against that idea, as in N-F-W that is gonna happen. The two have apparently shared some pretty heated exchanges on the subject. Interesting to note that Daley already feels secure enough to challenge Jarrett in this way, leading me to believe he has something on her. I say again most likely Chicago. All roads lead back to Chicago with this White House. Yes, the current irony of me making that statement does not escape me. Hah!


And have you noticed presence of Jarrett everywhere? She gave an interview on Fox for fucksake. Anyone still doubting my statements Jarrett is the true power in the administration can go to hell. She is the real voice of Obama. His words are first her words and that has never been more true than thispast year.

Daley may attempt to challenge that situation though, and things could get very interesting from there. Bill Daley can greatly improve Obama’s chances in 2012. I and many others within the party have the utmost respect for Bill’s political instincts. He is already doing considerable work to mend fences between this White House and moderate Democrats. If Jarrett maintains her hold over this administration, Obama’s chances for reelection are greatly diminished IMO. Many are in wait and see mode regarding that situation – Jarrett vs Daley. Not sure where Plouffe will fall in on that, but he may prove the deciding factor given the 2012 campaign is now fully underway for Obama.

Some of your readers might not realize the dynamics between Jarrett, Plouffe, and Daley.

Daley really is more of the Bill Clinton school, not the far-left Jarrett Chicago school. His brother has even less respect for the Obama group. As for Plouffe, he was an Obama believer back in the day along with the rest of us, but now maybe he’s just cashing a big check? Daley’s appointment was not of Jarrett’s choosing, but came with the strong “suggestion” of some prominent donors who were sending out the signals that their support of Obama in 2012 was not a sure thing. Bill Daley is the guy who is to mend some fences and shut down much of the progressive crap that dominated the first two years of the Obama White House, and that fact has to be driving hardliners like Valerie Jarrett absolutely fucking nuts. Jarrett worked for the Daley machine. I don’t think Bill Daley considers the present situation as in any way working for the likes of Valerie Jarrett.

All of this may be better served for discussion at another time though as this is getting a bit long winded on my part. Sorry about that.

At any rate, watch for possible stories of Daley/Jarrett friction as from what I have been told, that friction is already well underway and in my view represents the battle for the soul of the current Democratic Party where the Oval Office is now ground zero.


Lastly but most important, flurry of activity coming out of Issa office very recently. Whispers now circulating something “concrete” has been found by Issa that is harmful to White House. Enough so that legal reps from White House most recently met directly with Issa office. Actually believe the Bill Daley appointment made in part to also help assist in heading that situation off in favor of the WH. I still don’t trust Issa to follow through. Fear he has gotten too cozy with WH but I could be wrong. I hope so.

As to that something “concrete” is it related to the scandal I maintain is out there festering? Birther related? Not certain, but an important thing to realize the growing number of Dems who are hopeful that is the case. That is a huge shift from just this time last year. More and more of us are increasingly angry at this administration and the damage it has done to so many inside the party.

The Ulsterman Report:
Sex and Murder in The Land of Obama?


A shocking tale of Barack Obama’s behavior following a high profile Chicago gathering of Democratic Party elites shortly before Obama won election to the Illinois State Senate.


From The Ulsterman:
This story came to me via a message to my Facebook account. Upon reading what the author had to say, and doing some preliminary investigation to attempt at least partial corroboration, I have finally determined, following what appears to be both a sincere and earnest request, to publish this recollection of what they say they saw from Barack Obama and a now deceased man who was in Barack Obama’s presence that night. The following is their recollection in its entirety – no editing has been done. I leave it to the readers to determine for themselves the validity of what the author of this story claims to have seen.




I was an intern for a local Chicago newspaper and a college student working toward a journalism degree. This happened before Barack Obama was president. It happened a short time before he became a state senator in Illinois. He was not the big name he would become just a few years later, but around Chicago he was a big enough name that I recognized who he was when I saw him. His book has just been published and he had received some recognition locally for it, and I had actually seen him on campus a couple of times the year before. He was an “up and comer”.

Anyways, I got the chance to attend this big dinner/party/celebration event downtown that had everybody who was anybody in Chicago at the time. It was an event that took place just before the big Democratic Party convention. The mayor was to give a talk and I was told to do a write up of the mayor’s comments and if possible, get a short interview. (I did not get the interview) I would figure about three or four hundred people were there. Lots of money and power in the room. As the night went on the drinking and noise levels both escalated. I remember being a bit shocked to see these kind of people carrying on like they were, but it was also exciting to be around it. I want to emphasize though that I was not drinking. I was clear headed the entire night. I saw what I saw. I know what I know.

Just before I was going to leave, I ran into one of my professors and sat down to have a talk. I remember being pretty excited that she actually remembered me, and even more excited that she seemed to want to ask me how I was doing and whatnot. I also remember she did seem a little drunk. We ended up sitting and talking for almost an hour and by the time she stood up to leave there were maybe just twenty or so people still hanging around. Everyone else had left.

I decided to look for a bathroom before taking off myself and followed a sign that led me down a hall that had all the lights already turned off. There were about four doors to the left that were to conference rooms, with a sign on the right of the hall pointing further down to the bathrooms. I was a little spooked because it was so dark but managed to find the bathroom. When I came back out I noticed one of the doors to a conference room was about halfway open. I had remembered that no doors had been open before and I got a little freaked out. I hesitated because I was afraid to walk by the door. That was when I heard the voices. Or not so much voices but I heard sounds being made by a person or people. I also smelled something that was odd. Never smelled it before or since that night. A heavy sweet smell that was filling up the hallway. It was not marijuana or anything like that. I was in college. I was plenty familiar with what marijuana smelled like. Something different. And as I stood there not quite sure what to do the smell seemed to go from sweet to kind of gross like rotting garbage. It was weird.
I started to try and sneak past the open door so whoever was in there couldn’t hear me but I sure could hear them and that was when I realized the sounds coming out of that conference room were sexual. I heard a male voice saying “Yeah,” again and again and then another sound from another male voice. I realized then that there were at least two men in that room having sex with themselves or someone else I could not hear. I was almost past the door when I heard a loud sniffing noise, and more of that weird smell coming from the room, and then one of the men yelled out the F-word. And that’s when I tripped. I tried to fall as quietly as I could but when my right hand hit the floor it kind of twisted under me and it really hurt. I cried out and then was trying to get up as fast as I could so I could keep heading down the hall. I heard some scrambling from inside the dark conference room and then one of the men told the other one to shut up and be quiet.

And then the door opened behind me and I turned around and saw a young tall thin black man looking at me. I recognized the face but wasn’t sure of the name right away, but was pretty sure he was someone important. I told him I was just using the bathroom but knew I must have looked very embarrassed. He just stared at me for what seemed like forever. There was just enough light in that hall that I could see that his eyes were not really “right”. I thought he was probably drunk. Then his eyes seemed to suddenly clear up and become a lot more focused and he looked down at me and he gave a big smile. He asked me if I was ok. I looked down to his belt which was undone and I could see that his dress shirt was not tucked into his pants. When I looked back up at his face the smile was long gone. He looked really angry at me now. He asked me again if I was ok but he said it in a way that really spooked me. There was something in his voice that scared me. Really bad. And it was at that exact moment I finally recognized his face as the author and political candidate Barack Obama.

I was just about to turn and walk as fast as I could out of the hallway when the door opened wider and another black man’s face poked out. He said, “What the F is going on B?” The guy I now recognized as Obama stepped all the way out of the hall and closed the door behind him, leaving the other man inside the conference room.

He asked me again if I was all right. Now he was standing right over me. He smiled again and I noticed one of his front teeth seemed to have a chip in it, or it was a lot shorter than the other one. He must have had work done because the pictures of him today don’t show that. I don’t know why I noticed that so much or why it has stuck with me but it has. And his breath smelled really bad. It made me want to gag it was so bad. I told him I was fine and did a kind of half walk half run down the hall and back into the main lobby. I looked back right before I turned the corner and could make out Barack Obama still standing in the darkness of the hallway looking back at me. It was very very creepy.

I didn’t really make much out of it. I mentioned it in a joking way to some friends that I had interrupted some guys going at it in a conference room but never mentioned the name Obama when I did. Then I forgot about it pretty much until I was watching the news and saw that Obama was running for U.S. Senator. I figured whatever he was doing in his private life was his business though, and didn’t want to make any trouble for him. I actually agreed with his politics and voted for him. If he was gay or bisexual, I really could have cared less. Whatever issues he had with that were between him and his family and none of my business right? That’s how I felt. So I forgot all about what I saw on that night again.

And I hardly thought of it when I heard Barack Obama was running for president.
That’s until I heard a news story coming from my television while I was making dinner. A man had been murdered. Shot numerous times at his home. I glanced up at the television and there was the now dead man’s face being shown. He looked older. Heavier. His hair was longer. But it was him. That was the same face that I had seen poke out from the conference room with Barack Obama about ten years earlier.

The news report said he was a church choir conductor and school teacher. They didn’t mention it was the same church as Barack Obama. I found that out a short time later. Then I learned that another gay man from Obama’s church had been murdered about a month before. That is when I started to really freak out. I kept my mouth shut and didn’t say a word about what I had seen.

I started to feel like I was being watched. I would see a car parked outside my apartment that wasn’t any of my neighbors. One time I caught a man staring at me from across the street as I was getting my mail. I worried I was losing my mind from way too much paranoia.

I have since moved away from Chicago. I have tried to forget all about what I saw, but it won’t leave my head. I’m scared. So now I’m telling you this. I have been reading your stuff and think that the way you are doing it is giving you enough protection to get out your information but also protecting you. So if you could do the same for me I would be very grateful. I need to tell this story, but I don’t want to be known for doing it. That scares me too much. So the same way you seem to protect yourself and your sources I am hoping you can do for me. I have to get this off my chest. Part of me says I should have said something sooner but another part of me says that maybe I would not be around today if I had done that.

I know what I saw and I know what I heard. I know who I saw. Maybe it was some kind of phase he was going through at the time. Maybe he was experimenting with a different lifestyle. Maybe the death of that man was just a coincidence. I don’t know the answers to that. I just know what I know. I just know what I heard and saw.

On that night I heard Barack Obama in that conference room with another man. I saw Barack Obama step out of that room with another man. I smelled what I think was some kind of drug they were using. And I know that the other man who was in that room with Barack Obama was murdered about ten years later shortly after Barack Obama declared he was running for President of the United States.

That is my story. I hope that you share it. If something happens to me now, you will know why.

I wonder why the author does not mention the name DONALD YOUNG in the story.

Larry Sinclair tried so hard to get this and other information out about the murder of Donald Young, as well as Obama's drug use and homosexual romps.



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poppers

Poppers is also called Rush, being described above as amyl nitrite, butyl nitrite, isopropyl nitrite and isobutyl nitrite.

It is a quick rush and only lasts less than a minute. If he had just done one before he came to the door it would make sense.




Early photos from that time period show Obama's teeth were indeed uneven.

The Obama Timeline
author, Don Fredrick


I have no reason to believe the allegations are not true. Obama’s background, which I researched and detailed in my book, The Obama Timeline, is entirely consistent with the charges.

Norma Jean Young, the mother of Donald Young, claims he was murdered to keep him quiet.

Neither Young’s murder or that of Larry Bland (another gay church member who was murdered two weeks before Young) have been solved.

Some people likely will doubt the story because its source wishes to remain anonymous, but one can hardly doubt him for being cautious.

UPDATE:

Since publication, many have come forward with evidence that would support some of the specific claims made within the recollection above.



The strange smell coming from the conference room would most likely have been “poppers”, a drug that is used predominantly within the gay community. Its smell is said to alter quickly from sweet to that of “rank, dirty laundry”. It’s effects last only a few minutes, indicating a user could recover quickly after inhaling it.



Second, both video and photo evidence were provided that show considerable work has been done on Barack Obama’s teeth.

Here is video from 1995, evidence that would further corroborate the timeline of this story, showing just how extensive this dental work in fact was. The alteration to both Obama’s appearance and speech is remarkable, and one of the front teeth does appear to be considerably shorter and/or of a very different shape than the other, which again compliments the details found in the recollection above:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fh7xMhsLnac

http://s3.amazonaws.com/readers/2011/02/13/teeth71_1.jpg



More confirmation of the timeframe details:

Research also uncovered the fact that Chicago Democrats, playing host to the national convention in August of 1996, held a number of large social events throughout that summer, including a visit by then President Bill Clinton during the first week of July – events that were described in some detail by the Chicago Tribune on July 4th, 1996:

The crowds, the parties, the security and the hoopla that accompanied President Clinton’s visit to Chicago, plus the meeting of Democratic leaders last weekend, provided test runs for the Aug. 26-29 Democratic National Convention, organizers said.
Even the Chicago ‘96 decorations that adorned Navy Pier and the red, white and blue lights atop the Hancock and Stone Container buildings were previews of what to expect later this summer, said Julie Thompson, spokeswoman for the civic host committee.​

MeeMie said:

On that night I heard Barack Obama in that conference room with another man. I saw Barack Obama step out of that room with another man. I smelled what I think was some kind of drug they were using. And I know that the other man who was in that room with Barack Obama was murdered about ten years later shortly after Barack Obama declared he was running for President of the United States.

That is my story. I hope that you share it. If something happens to me now, you will know why.

Click to expand...

Does this mean you are going to commit suicide? If you do, can I have your paranoia? Mine doesn't work as good as yours does. I need to upgrade.

Post 52 excerpt - Reflections of the White House Insider

The portrait of a looming scandal Insider has so successfully woven throughout a number of these interviews.

Is this scandal legitimate, or simply a device to send the Obama White House scurrying for cover – some form of political distraction intended to allow Insider and others within the party to ultimately develop a platform in which to launch successful opposition?

“The DOJ, Washington DC, and then back to Chicago.”

According to Insider, there lies the path to this president’s downfall. President Obama’s murky ties with some of Chicago’s most notorious politicos is known, though Insider might indicate not so nearly known as they should be. What of Broadway Bank? Shorebank? Tony Rezko? Rod Blagojevich? And so many other names that darken the murky past that is Barack Obama.

The Obama Department of Justice is now facing far more scrutiny than when Insider initially stated that this developing scandal would begin there – with the DOJ. Is something to be found among the Black Panther voter intimidation case? Has Attorney General Eric Holder been engaged in a protective cover up of Obama’s complicity in the Rod Blagojevich pay to play scandal?




Current Update:


Stop the Presses:
Shutting Down the Civil Rights Commission’s Investigation of DOJ


President Obama and Harry Reid have used their appointment powers to stop the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights' investigation into the New Black Panther Party voter-intimidation case.



Department’s race-based decision to dismiss the New Black Panther Party voter-intimidation case — a case DOJ had effectively won. But now President Obama and Harry Reid have used their appointment powers to stop the investigation.

Never mind the incontrovertible (and mounting) evidence that Eric Holder’s Justice Department applies a racial double standard to the enforcement of several civil rights laws. Holder has been trying to shut down the investigation for 18 months by unlawfully stonewalling all requests for relevant documents and emails and ordering Department employees not to appear for depositions and interviews when subpoenaed.

On Feb. 11, the Commission had its first business meeting with the replacements for several of the commissioners whose terms had expired in December. Former Commissioners Ashley Taylor and Gerald Reynolds had supported the investigation of both the DOJ’s dismissal of the voter-intimidation lawsuit and the far more damning testimony regarding the harassment and intimidation of anyone at DOJ who believes in the race-neutral enforcement of the civil rights laws.

Obama’s two new commissioners, Marty Castro and Roberta Achtenberg, and Harry Reid’s new appointee, Dina Titus (with the unfortunate help of Vice Chairman Abigail Thernstrom), voted to end the NBPP investigation. This despite the outstanding subpoenas the Justice Department has ignored and its total lack of cooperation. The new majority wouldn’t even agree to postpone the vote for one month until Commissioner Pete Kirsanow could be heard on the question (the new majority waited until Kirsanow had to leave the meeting to offer its motion).

So if a court orders the DOJ to turn over documents it is withholding from Judicial Watch, The Washington Times, Pajamas Media or other FOIA requesters, the Commission on Civil Rights, which has been pursuing the matter for 18 months, can’t consider it. The same goes if new House Judiciary Chairman Lamar Smith convinces the Department to cough up the documents it has wrongfully withheld from Congress. How this vote to kill future Commission work on the investigation affects its outstanding subpoenas to DOJ is unclear, but it doesn’t really matter because DOJ now knows the new majority couldn’t care less whether DOJ continues to ignore them.

The new majority also voted to “suspend” the printing of the Commission’s Interim Report by the Government Printing Office until Nancy Pelosi’s presumptive appointee Michael Yaki is reappointed and can write a new rebuttal to add to his already existing dissent in the report. Given the unbelievable dissent he already filed jointly with Harry Reid’s previous appointee, any future rebuttal is sure to be a major work of conspiracy fiction (and we’ll wait to see whether the new Democratic Commissars actually “unsuspend” the printing of the report).

I attended the Commission’s key hearings and read the transcript of many of its other proceedings on this matter. I couldn’t believe how the Commission’s Democratic appointees abandoned their duty as civil rights commissioners in order to defend the administration’s stonewalling. While he was still on the Commission, Yaki opposed every effort to probe how the Holder Justice Department handles its critical responsibility to enforce equal justice under the law. Instead, Yaki acted as the virtual defense counsel for the Obama administration, trying to stop the investigation and obscure and obfuscate the Commission’s findings.

Nevertheless, it would be wrong to imply that the DOJ’s refusal to supply its emails and documents leaves us without solid evidence of wrongdoing at the Department. The DOJ emails and documents would almost certainly prove even more damning (why would DOJ unlawfully withhold documents that could help its case?), but the sworn whistleblower testimony and other incontrovertible evidence in the Commission’s Interim Report is damning enough. Indeed, I highly recommend reading the electronic version of the Commission’s Interim Report, which is on the Commission’s website (at least for now).

The Commission’s Interim Report details the infamous and lawless conduct not just of the New Black Panther Party, but of the Justice Department and its current officials. It includes excerpts of the whistleblowers’ shocking testimony, examples of instructions by DOJ officials not to enforce the civil rights laws on behalf of whites, and powerful concurring statements from commissioners who worked on the investigation for so long.

The new majoritarian Politburo on the Commission can shut down further investigation of DOJ wrongdoing all it wants and it can stop the presses on the Commission’s report. But what the Commission has already uncovered shows a damning and intolerable contempt for equal justice and the rule of law.

Chicago style.

overthebow said:

Does this mean you are going to commit suicide? If you do, can I have your paranoia? Mine doesn't work as good as yours does. I need to upgrade.

Click to expand...

Had you bothered to read the post that you referenced, you would know that the person you quoted is not me.

It is a young woman journalist who witnessed Barrack Obama in an embarrassing incident that later involved murder.

She wasn't about to commit suicide either. Her fear was that she would be murdered, as the two homosexuals mentioned were.

But now, at least, I see how you have no qualms about making derogatory comments about subject matter that you refuse to even learn about.

For a while, at least, the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights was investigating the Justice Department’s race-based decision to dismiss the New Black Panther Party voter-intimidation case — a case DOJ had effectively won. But now President Obama and Harry Reid have used their appointment powers to stop the investigation.

Never mind the incontrovertible evidence that Eric Holder’s Justice Department applies a racial double standard to the enforcement of several civil rights laws. Holder has been trying to shut down the investigation for 18 months by unlawfully stonewalling all requests for relevant documents and emails and ordering Department employees not to appear for depositions and interviews when subpoenaed.

On Feb. 11, the Commission had its first business meeting with the replacements for several of the commissioners whose terms had expired in December. Former Commissioners Ashley Taylor and Gerald Reynolds had supported the investigation of both the DOJ’s dismissal of the voter-intimidation lawsuit and the far more damning testimony regarding the harassment and intimidation of anyone at DOJ who believes in the race-neutral enforcement of the civil rights laws.

Obama’s two new commissioners, Marty Castro and Roberta Achtenberg, and Harry Reid’s new appointee, Dina Titus (with the unfortunate help of Vice Chairman Abigail Thernstrom), voted to end the NBPP investigation. This despite the outstanding subpoenas the Justice Department has ignored and its total lack of cooperation. The new majority wouldn’t even agree to postpone the vote for one month until Commissioner Pete Kirsanow could be heard on the question (the new majority waited until Kirsanow had to leave the meeting to offer its motion).

So if a court orders the DOJ to turn over documents it is withholding from Judicial Watch, The Washington Times, Pajamas Media or other FOIA requesters, the Commission on Civil Rights, which has been pursuing the matter for 18 months, can’t consider it.

The same goes if new House Judiciary Chairman Lamar Smith convinces the Department to cough up the documents it has wrongfully withheld from Congress. How this vote to kill future Commission work on the investigation affects its outstanding subpoenas to DOJ is unclear, but it doesn’t really matter because DOJ now knows the new majority couldn’t care less whether DOJ continues to ignore them.

The new majority also voted to “suspend” the printing of the Commission’s Interim Report by the Government Printing Office until Nancy Pelosi’s presumptive appointee Michael Yaki is reappointed and can write a new rebuttal to add to his already existing dissent in the report. Given the unbelievable dissent he already filed jointly with Harry Reid’s previous appointee, any future rebuttal is sure to be a major work of conspiracy fiction (and we’ll wait to see whether the new Democratic Commissars actually “unsuspend” the printing of the report).

The Commission’s Democratic appointees abandoned their duty as civil rights commissioners in order to defend the administration’s stonewalling. While he was still on the Commission, Yaki opposed every effort to probe how the Holder Justice Department handles its critical responsibility to enforce equal justice under the law. Instead, Yaki acted as the virtual defense counsel for the Obama administration, trying to stop the investigation and obscure and obfuscate the Commission’s findings.

Justice, Chicago style.

MeeMie said:

For a while, at least, the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights was investigating the Justice Department’s race-based decision to dismiss the New Black Panther Party voter-intimidation case — a case DOJ had effectively won. But now President Obama and Harry Reid have used their appointment powers to stop the investigation.

Never mind the incontrovertible evidence that Eric Holder’s Justice Department applies a racial double standard to the enforcement of several civil rights laws. Holder has been trying to shut down the investigation for 18 months by unlawfully stonewalling all requests for relevant documents and emails and ordering Department employees not to appear for depositions and interviews when subpoenaed.

On Feb. 11, the Commission had its first business meeting with the replacements for several of the commissioners whose terms had expired in December. Former Commissioners Ashley Taylor and Gerald Reynolds had supported the investigation of both the DOJ’s dismissal of the voter-intimidation lawsuit and the far more damning testimony regarding the harassment and intimidation of anyone at DOJ who believes in the race-neutral enforcement of the civil rights laws.

Obama’s two new commissioners, Marty Castro and Roberta Achtenberg, and Harry Reid’s new appointee, Dina Titus (with the unfortunate help of Vice Chairman Abigail Thernstrom), voted to end the NBPP investigation. This despite the outstanding subpoenas the Justice Department has ignored and its total lack of cooperation. The new majority wouldn’t even agree to postpone the vote for one month until Commissioner Pete Kirsanow could be heard on the question (the new majority waited until Kirsanow had to leave the meeting to offer its motion).

So if a court orders the DOJ to turn over documents it is withholding from Judicial Watch, The Washington Times, Pajamas Media or other FOIA requesters, the Commission on Civil Rights, which has been pursuing the matter for 18 months, can’t consider it.

The same goes if new House Judiciary Chairman Lamar Smith convinces the Department to cough up the documents it has wrongfully withheld from Congress. How this vote to kill future Commission work on the investigation affects its outstanding subpoenas to DOJ is unclear, but it doesn’t really matter because DOJ now knows the new majority couldn’t care less whether DOJ continues to ignore them.

The new majority also voted to “suspend” the printing of the Commission’s Interim Report by the Government Printing Office until Nancy Pelosi’s presumptive appointee Michael Yaki is reappointed and can write a new rebuttal to add to his already existing dissent in the report. Given the unbelievable dissent he already filed jointly with Harry Reid’s previous appointee, any future rebuttal is sure to be a major work of conspiracy fiction (and we’ll wait to see whether the new Democratic Commissars actually “unsuspend” the printing of the report).

The Commission’s Democratic appointees abandoned their duty as civil rights commissioners in order to defend the administration’s stonewalling. While he was still on the Commission, Yaki opposed every effort to probe how the Holder Justice Department handles its critical responsibility to enforce equal justice under the law. Instead, Yaki acted as the virtual defense counsel for the Obama administration, trying to stop the investigation and obscure and obfuscate the Commission’s findings.

Justice, Chicago style.

Click to expand...

Government....Chicago style.

The part that bothered me the most was that he thought that banks and big business were "striking back" at him for implementing further job-killing regulation. Is that his governance guiding philosophy?....the motivation of personal revenge? What about creating jobs, a healthy future, a dynamic nation.....no....it's personal. Blah.

Wow..what a read...fact or fiction..still....the whole Thread, of course, just 'Wow', and what the hell does, wow, mean, but anyways, it expresses my reaction, whatever it means....keep on keepin' on!

amicus

RightField said:

The part that bothered me the most was that he thought that banks and big business were "striking back" at him for implementing further job-killing regulation. Is that his governance guiding philosophy?

Click to expand...

No, but it is certainly something of which he has to take account. What, you don't think this is personal to the banks, etc.? It is.

Rahm Emanuel and The Jarrett White House


Regarding his time as President Barack Obama’s White House Chief of Staff, Rahm Emanuel likely has lots to say. Indeed he does…



When Rahm Emanuel abruptly announced his intention to leave his position with the Obama White House to initiate a campaign to be Chicago’s next mayor, Inside-the-Beltway eyebrows raised in unison at the move. Reports circulated that Emanuel and White House adviser Valerie Jarrett, as well as First Lady Michelle Obama, were in near-constant disagreement over the tone and direction of White House policy. Most notable among these disagreements was the push for Obamacare that dominated the then newly elected president’s agenda.


As White House Chief of Staff, Rahm had warned against moving on healthcare until after the economy was first on a clear path to recovery. With the strong urging of Valerie Jarrett, and reported demands from high ranking labor union leaders, President Obama disregarded Emanuel’s warnings and forged ahead with healthcare reform. Accepting the president’s decision to do so, Emanuel then cautioned both Obama and Jarett that such a move for healthcare reform would require a strong, consistent, and totally unified message from within the Democratic Party – and that as president, Obama must lead that messaging – messaging that must be an all out offensive to convince the hearts and minds of Americans that healthcare reform was the right thing at the right time.


Obama failed miserably in doing so. Early in the debate, Emanuel was appalled to hear the president explain to him how “Our friends in the media…uh, you know, they got this thing covered. We’ve all wanted this for, uh, a very…we’ve been working at this, for a very long time and now the news, uh, the media is gonna push this to the finish line for us. We’ll win the argument.” The president had no clue as to how to actually forge legislation. He was in effect handing the debate over to the media, along with the leadership members of Congress. Not only did the president lack any clue – he cared little to remedy that shortcoming. Rahm Emanuel began to realize that for Barack Obama, ignorance truly was bliss.


Instead of placing blame for the inevitable chaos that was the Obamacare legislation on Congressional Democrats and White House advisers – namely Valerie Jarrett, Obama turned against his White House Chief of Staff – the very figure who had so recently warned the president such chaos might very well result. Rahm found himself marginalized within an administration that was bereft of both real experience, and at times, even the simplest forms of pragmatic leadership. Soon, Emanuel’s opinion was rarely sought out within Obama’s West Wing, leaving Rahm to instead spend increasing time listening to the growing concerns of moderate Democrats facing political annihilation in the upcoming November election cycle. The more communication Emanuel had with these moderate Democrats, the more he was seen by both Jarrett and the First Lady as a figure who could not be trusted. Jarrett’s influence over the president grew substantially during those weeks and months. When an open confrontation between Emanuel and the First Lady erupted just steps from the president, Obama barely paid it notice at the time, though the incident most certainly worsened the White House Chief of Staff’s already rapidly declining position within the administration. At no time was this decline made more clear to Emanuel as when he directed a very simple policy question to the president only to see Obama quickly look over to Jarrett, who shot back at Emanuel, “We – the president, will get back to you on that.” Jarrett had become Obama’s brain – he now appeared near-incapable of even making the most basic of executive decisions without her approval.


Around that same time, an unlikely alliance was forged between Emanuel and then House Majority Leader Nancy Pelosi, who while publicly maintaining a position of confidence that the November elections would not be nearly as bad for Democrats as some were predicting, was behind the scenes furious at how little effort President Obama had expended in selling the healthcare legislation. The term “Fu–ing moron” in describing Obama is said to have been used by Pelosi on more than one occasion in the presence of Emanuel. Each of them reached out to the most significant of the non-labor union party donors to voice their now shared concern for the seeming inability of President Obama to effectively engage in the job of President of the United States. It was among these donors that the presence of a festering White House scandal began to be quietly spoken of, leading some to worry that further investment in Obama Inc. might very well prove irresponsible if said scandal were to develop into full blown public awareness. These same figures feared the resulting damage to the Democratic Party would be too great, its impacts too long lasting, and thus demanded that both Pelosi and Emanuel remain quiet on the information – at least until such time as it became viable to allow it to go public. To ensure this silence, each were offered future positions of power. One would be allowed to remain on as minority leader should the Democrats lose the House in the November elections, and the other would be allowed to be elected Mayor of Chicago. All sides agreed – though neither side knew the agreement made by the other. Pelosi continued to assure Rahm he could count on her unwavering support as he sought to somehow improve the performance of President Obama while simultaneously waging his ongoing battle against Jarrett.


In the interim between his still not yet public plan to leave the White House and run for Chicago mayor, Rahm Emanuel began an in-house campaign against both Valerie Jarrett and Michelle Obama, resulting in significant staff departure, and a considerable uptick of in-house information making its way to the public, if even by less than mainstream media means. And while the still-White House Chief of Staff engaged in this passive aggressive battle against the two women who held sway over the President of the United States, Rahm held out hope that Barack Obama would somehow rise to the level of his own considerable potential and prove himself both willing and able to fully coordinate the duties of president. That potential was never met. Obama remained a perplexing mixture of passivity and totally self-involved arrogance. During a brief meeting with a senior member of the Senate, Rahm learned of the term “the tool” as it was applied to Obama. So said this senior Democrat, “That is all he is to us. A damn tool. And a blunt tool at that.” Emanuel took no pleasure in hearing his president being described in such terms, but he also knew that Obama had shown little to prove otherwise.


Just as he prepared to make his intentions of leaving the White House known to the president, Emanuel was given a terrible warning, – his intention to leave had already become known to Valerie Jarrett. The warning came from none other than his former boss, Bill Clinton.



To be continued...

White House Insider: Republicans are a Bunch of Spineless Pukes


Our most recent D.C. Insider update warns of a political deal having been struck between Republican Congressman Darrell Issa and the Obama White House that will help secure Obama’s re-election as president in 2012.


Notes:
This update consists of questions emailed to our D.C. Insider and their emailed responses back, with some follow-up questions allowed as well. We wish to express our gratitude at Insider’s willingness to take the time to respond, and also wish to apologize for recent actions on my part that they felt compromised the integrity of their reputation and participation in these (thankfully) still ongoing communications.



Question: I was told President Obama held a high level 2012 campaign strategy meeting very recently. Can you confirm, and if so, any information regarding the discussions?

Insider: What you heard is correct. President Obama did hold such a meeting. As to specific information on this particular meeting I don’t have anything for you. I have been told that President Obama is “supremely confident” in his chances for a second term. He has nothing but contempt and disdain for the Republican Party. His frame of mind is that there is no way they defeat him in 2012. No way.

Follow Up: Why is the president so confident about 2012?

Insider: I would chalk it up to his being told the big money people are back on board. They have been threatening him for months about not giving him the kind of support he had in 2008. I’ve been telling you about that. Now they are falling back in line and that has got to be playing a part in Obama’s belief he can’t lose. And frankly, he’s probably right. Things are just not breaking our way at the moment. Those of us who are trying to get this guy out of the White House, well, it’s just not happening for us.



Question: In the past, more than once, you have suggested the president is depressed, or suffers mood swings beyond what most would consider “normal”. Is that still the case?

Insider: Yes.

Follow Up: Could you elaborate?

Insider: No.

Question: I assume you read the report I sent you detailing how the DOJ New Black Panther investigation has been effectively squashed by the Obama administration. Any thoughts?

Insider: ” Things are just not breaking our way at the moment. Those of us who are trying to get this guy out of the White House, well, it’s just not happening for us.” That pretty much sums it up right? I knew there was a possibility of that happening. I didn’t think the White House would be so open about it. They have basically shut down a legit investigation. The DOJ scares the fuck out of me these days. It really does. The Civil Rights report that came out was there. Even the media gave it some life. And then it went away and now the whole thing is dead. Gone. Done. It’s disappointing and more than a little fucking scary to see something like that happen. And let me say something else on this. Your Republicans are a bunch of spineless pukes. If you are holding out hope that they are going to push this White House into revealing itself, you better wake up. It’s not going to happen. At least it sure as hell doesn’t appear so right now. They are a bunch of fucking jokes. As for Issa. Well, let’s just say he is not to be trusted. I got that message loud and clear now. A fucking sell out is what he is.

Follow Up: Why does the DOJ scare you so much? And what happened with Issa?

Insider: No comment.

Follow Up: You warned in previous updates that Issa appeared to be making some kind of deal with the Obama administration. Are you now saying that has in fact happened?

Insider: No comment.

Follow Up: Not good enough. You need to clarify that statement. Please.

Insider: I don’t need to clarify anything to you. Maybe instead of posting nonsense about allegations from 15 years ago you should have been keeping an eye on what was going on around the Issa office.

Follow Up: What was going on around the Issa office?

Insider: No, question is what was not going on around the Issa office. I’m not going to spell every fucking thing out for you.

Question: So are you giving up? Obama is president again in 2012? Is that how all of this plays out?

Insider: Maybe. Maybe not. I don’t know at this point. The DOJ thing was not good news for us. Like I said, we expected that could happen. Didn’t think the White House would be so open about it. That shows a lot of confidence on their part and that has us concerned. But that’s not the biggest concern regarding that. It’s the absolute lack of any response by the Republicans. Nothing. Zip. Zero. An entire investigation is just shut down and they say nothing about it? Promises were made and they are not being kept. To say some of us are now feeling vulnerable is a huge fucking understatement.

Follow Up: What promises? Who? What? Why?

Insider: No comment.

Question: With all due respect, you sound defeated. Obama wins and you lose. That is how this sounds.

Insider: If Obama wins, I don’t lose. It’s way bigger than that. Don’t send me such an idiotic statement. America loses. Every one of us. The idiots who still support this president. They are losing. The ones who say they don’t support him but aren’t really paying attention. They are losing. And yeah, the ones who are fighting and risking a whole hell of a lot to keep this guy from another four years, we are losing. WE ARE ALL LOSING. You know the deal. I could step away from all of this. I can live out whatever years I got left comfortably. Finish up this campaign and call it a day. But can this country survive another four years of this administration? That is what motivates me. Call it bullsh– if you want. I don’t care. That’s what is motivating me. That’s why I’m talking to you and to others. And it’s not just me. It’s we. We are doing this. We are trying to help save us from this mess. But it just isn’t going our way because people like Issa don’t keep their fucking word.

Follow Up: Again, you sound defeated. Are you saying Congressman Issa is not going to investigate the White House as promised?

Insider: Yes. Either his office has successfully shut off all leaks indicating otherwise, which as much as I would like to believe, I don’t, or a deal was made between the White House and his office. And that means that the Republican leadership signed off on it as well. Why they would do that I just don’t know. It’s like the Pelosi deal right after the midterms. That woman was gone and then suddenly she was back in. Somebody talked to somebody and she was once again safe and keeping her mouth shut. Whatever promises she made were null and void. For that kind of stuff to go down without people like me being able to know about it????? FUCK! That is not supposed to happen.

Question: What should we look for in the coming days and weeks?

Insider: Keep watching Issa. Maybe he’s got us fooled. I sure hope so. There is a current transition process quietly underway for the Geithner departure. Actually a bit of infighting over that. Jarrett wants him out, Daley is a supporter. That bit of info is something entirely new. Was not aware of that. Will be interesting to watch how it plays out between Jarrett and Daley. The war between those two may be an opening for us. As you already know, I have great respect for Bill Daley. Also look for a party scandal to emerge. This is being used to deflect from the White House, so don’t get too excited when it breaks out. Even though it involves Democrats, it is being manufactured to deflect from the White House. That would indicate a member of the party is being sacrificed to protect Obama and/or someone in the administration. Pretty common. Have been involved in those scenarios personally.

Follow Up: Pigford?

Insider: Possible. What a mess that thing is. But it would be a perfect tool to distract/protect the White House. There is something bigger than that out there though. Something directly involving the White House that is being protected. I am not certain of what, but have suspicions. It’s got people spooked because they have shut up about it. Very little information getting out, which in this business, means it’s something very serious.

Follow Up: Birther related?

Insider: No comment.

Question: So Pigford is not the big scandal?

Insider: Not likely. A distraction. A cover. A deception. Possibly the very deal that was made between Issa and the administration.

Follow Up: How would the Pigford scandal be a deal between the White House and Issa?

Insider: Issa backs off any “real” investigations against WH. Is given a lower level Democrat to prove “guilty”, maybe a USDA official or member of Congress that is already on their way out regardless. Issa may wish to run for president in 2016. He is given the PR of a successful investigation and seen as being tough on fraud and waste in government. He may also be promised money and support in 2016. So the Democratic Party takes a minor hit, but ultimately Obama is protected from any real damage. Issa stops any and all investigations that might lead directly to the White House in order to better secure his chances for running for president in 2016.

Follow Up: Do you really believe that is what has happened? Is that why there has been so little response by Republicans regarding the DOJ NBP investigation being shut down? That Congressman Issa has made a deal with the Obama White House? That he is now actively protecting the administration?

Insider: YES. Issa can go after the Democratic Party, but not Obama. Barack Obama is more than willing to sacrifice his own party for his own benefit. That has already been proven again and again. Yes, I do believe Congressman Issa is playing a part in that. I warned you many times not to trust Issa. It seems my warnings are proving correct, and that is not good news for anyone who doesn’t want to see Barack Obama re-elected in 2012.






...

"Republicans are a bunch of spineless pukes."

True or false?

phrodeau said:

"Republicans are a bunch of spineless pukes."

True or false?

Click to expand...

That's all you got out of the whole interview? Fucking unbelievable.

Go back to start on page one and read every word in every post. Maybe THEN you'll realize what an idiot you're supporting.