Obama must be utterly destroyed politically.

ahhhh, so you are saying the US auto industry has been socialised as well? even though it hasn't?

I've been waiting two days to post this somewhere, and I'm tired of waiting for the right thread.

The government has made $4 billion so far on TARP I (a 15% ROI)
 
No, I thought he was a moron but I attacked his policies and decisions.

Your mistake was thinking George W. Bush was a moron. Have confidence in your convictions: know he is a moron, not 'was'. Seriously, he's a rather dim, shallow individual propped up by advisers, chickenhawk charlatans and meatball constituents. He sucked as a businessman (shamelessly inept) and filled in nicely as the governor of a state where the governor is traditionally weak.

The timing to run for President was perfect following the equally shameless - but intellectually superior in comparison - Bill Clinton (a man with zipper and truth issues).
 
He's afflicted with Inflated Intellectual Superiority Syndrome.

its sorta funny

Bush was supposed to be THE MORON

and Kerry the BRAIN

yet they went to the same school and Bush's grades were better and his miltary tests were better than was Kerry's


OTOH, the BEAUTIFUL PEEPS love to call Southerners with accents MORONS!:D
 
You never called him a moron eh?:rolleyes:

Yes, because when he did something moronic he deserved to be called a moron. Did you consider telling insurgents in Iraq to "bring it on" to be intelligent or moronic. That's the difference.

Of course this conversation isn't about calling someone a name, but since when did the actual topic being discussed ever impact your posts.
 
Well, dipshit, it is OUR perspective we are talking about here, to us he did "nationalize" a major part of the auto industry, and we care little if that piece of fly shit is lost in your pepper shaker. Oh, and there's nothing like somebody calling another a "dimwit" when they themselves can't even spell.


you see, it doesn't make any difference where in the world you are, socialism is the same where ever. It's also different from 'Nationalising' a company. If you can't distinguish the difference you should maybe stick to licking ishy's arse.

Obama hasn't socialised your auto industry, he's bailed a few companies out. whether long term that will prove to be a good thing remains to be seen. Neither has he 'socialised' your health industry.
 
I've been waiting two days to post this somewhere, and I'm tired of waiting for the right thread.

The government has made $4 billion so far on TARP I (a 15% ROI)

the gov has only gotten paid back by a fraction of the banks they lent $$ to

and of those

JPM/WFC/ didnt need TARP, and was FORCED to accept, and GS didnt need it, but wanted it anyway, So the STRONG bks paid em off and the gov made money

the others, the weak ones havent paid back anything and were they to do so now(even though they have no $$$ to do it) the TARP would be a LOSS

so you gotta look at the BIG PIC


You might as well say that Soetoro has a 92% approval rating

(if only COLOREDS are AXED):rolleyes:
 
He's nothing more than a Soros puppet. Bought, paid for and a stamp on bottom.
 
I've been waiting two days to post this somewhere, and I'm tired of waiting for the right thread.

The government has made $4 billion so far on TARP I (a 15% ROI)

Incorrect!

I would never lie to you my friend.

the gov has only gotten paid back by a fraction of the banks they lent $$ to

and of those

JPM/WFC/ didnt need TARP, and was FORCED to accept, and GS didnt need it, but wanted it anyway, So the STRONG bks paid em off and the gov made money

the others, the weak ones havent paid back anything and were they to do so now(even though they have no $$$ to do it) the TARP would be a LOSS

so you gotta look at the BIG PIC


You might as well say that Soetoro has a 92% approval rating

(if only COLOREDS are AXED):rolleyes:

See:

The U.S. government has made a profit of about $4 billion on the bank bailout program so far as some of the largest banks have already repaid their loans, according to a report by the New York Times.

The article said the profit so far amounts to about a 15 percent return annually, and that the news comes as a pleasant surprise given a lot of controversy around the Troubled Asset Relief Program when it was approved.

The profit so far has included $1.4 billion from Goldman Sachs, $1.3 billion from Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS) and $414 million on American Express (NYSE: AXP), as well as between $100 million and $334 million in profit from the five other banks that have repaid the government, according to the Times report. It does not include $35 million from 14 smaller banks.


My first post was correct. You can twist and qualify as you wish, but you can't change the facts.
 
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3434/3243809371_47ebb41bfe.jpg

http://images.encyclopediadramatica.com/images/0/00/Internettoughguys.gif

----------

internet tough guy

simular to the flamer and angry young man. the internet tough guy is a commonly a individual on the internet who tends to post agressive and threatening posts a marked tendancy towards right wing opnions on pretty much everything. anyone who disagrees with his or on occasion her will usually face a incorherant terade of homosexual referances and direct threats of physical voilence. (despite the sheer implausability of them tracking someone down) irrational hatred of anyone differant or vaguegly left/humane/intelligent or willing to critisise them. Also staunch supposters of anything voilent or aggressive and anyone who isnt is a 'PUSSY LIBERAL FAG'.
in truth internet tough guys are rather sad individuals with little or no dignity or charm

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=internet+tough+guy

uhhhh...who's the liberal doofus that can't spell that put that onto the internet...?
did you actually bother to read that piece of comedy before posting it, Trudy?
 
All we had to do with Bush was let him do it to himself. Every time he opened his mouth he made a fool of himself. Every time he tried something he failed.

Exactly, and because the Democratic party made no effort to stop Bush from making a fool of himself, they are partly to blame!

Republican Circular Logic - It's Not Just For AJ Anymore!
 
If I weren't so lazy I'd go back to my postings from October to show that I said the taxpayer would make money on TARP I.

Of course, everything following TARP I has been, and will continue to be an economic disaster.
 
You have your ways of rationalizing things and we have our ways, it's not the same, we are a different people with different values, a different language, with a while different political perspective.
Like the Congressman said a few weeks back: You have Beck on your side, We have facts.

You don't like me, that's fine, I have no problem with it. I don't like you either, I think you're a shrewish dullard with tits. I'm not trying to change your mind, and you aren't going to change mine, so lets just agree to disagree; but hey, if you want to have a shit throwing contest, I'm game.

Oooh, Misogyny AND Vetteman's patented fascination with all things scatological, all in one sentence!
 
See:

The U.S. government has made a profit of about $4 billion on the bank bailout program so far as some of the largest banks have already repaid their loans, according to a report by the New York Times.

The article said the profit so far amounts to about a 15 percent return annually, and that the news comes as a pleasant surprise given a lot of controversy around the Troubled Asset Relief Program when it was approved.

The profit so far has included $1.4 billion from Goldman Sachs, $1.3 billion from Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS) and $414 million on American Express (NYSE: AXP), as well as between $100 million and $334 million in profit from the five other banks that have repaid the government, according to the Times report. It does not include $35 million from 14 smaller banks.


My first post was correct. You can twist and qualify as you wish, but you can't change the facts.


The U.S. government has made a profit of about $4 billion on the bank bailout program so far as some of the largest banks have already repaid their loans, according to a report by the New York Times.

SOME of the BANKS, SOME

while your post was CORRECT

it was MISLEADING

Whatever, DUDE

have a great day!
:D
 
Back
Top