Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The paradigm I'm thinking of in all these examples is the seduction of someone you've had your eye on for a long time -- someone you've really wanted. Someone you want to impress and say something special to with your lovemaking. Or maybe that's just me. Maybe I'm the only one who wants to impress someone by being a good lover.
You're competing with each other to give pleasure. You're competing to take what you want as well. Someone's going to come first. You want it to be her. That's selfish. Sometimes you're giving and you want it to be you. You're competing for control, to maintain control of yourself and not turn into a sexual beast before she does. You're both trying to drive each other out of your minds, so that's a competition. What else is it?
I don't play nice and I don't take turns. It's ropes and whips and biting and scratching with me; man vs. woman, struggling for dominance, trying to shame each other with pleasure and see how much they can take. Now maybe that makes me a sick fuck but I don't care. That's the way sex is for me, hot and wild and passionate, half love and half fight, and that's way I want it.![]()
Being a great lover is a skill that developes over time. I like to think of myself as a great lover who both focuses on her lover's desires and loses herself in the moment. One is not exclusive of the other, IMO.
No, I really doubt that. I think the impulse is best resisted, though. What? Why would I say a thing like that? It's because if you're focused on trying to be a good lover, then your love-making is about YOU, about your ego, your pride. If you focus on your lover, chances are you'll be a good lover, but the focus will be on her, and you'll be caught up in the moment and participating, not watching yourself and judging. Being fully present in the moment is way more sexy than the very best technique, in my opinion.
*sigh* *hug* Driving each other out of your minds sounds like a lovely idea. Doing it as a competition seems weird to me -- how can you be passionate if part of you is keeping score? The best sex I ever had was with a man who was very adept at turning into a sexual beast, and his doing so ramped up my sexuality, and my ramping up ramped up his, and off we went, to an out-of-our-minds experience. I've also had a controlled, watchful lover who was very careful not to lose it, so as to stay in control of everything. He was so technically excellent that he was fun, but he couldn't match the sheer passion of beastman -- I usually felt like a project with him, and project is not sexy.
Whips and biting and scratching are three of my favorite things, and I've never called you a sick fuck. I'm just suggesting that things might be even hotter and more passionate if you weren't keeping score, if you were participating, rather than performing.
You must have missed the part about "losing herself in the moment" - that sounds good to me - it is not wrong to be selfish, to focus on your needs, nobody like to think they disappointed their lover, but that cuts both ways: if you are so selfish as to be inattentive, then that might not be a good thing either - granted, these are generalities, and individual mileage may vary.Being a great lover is a skill that developes over time. I like to think of myself as a great lover who both focuses on her lover's desires and loses herself in the moment. One is not exclusive of the other, IMO.
But if you're focusing on your lover's desires, you're not focusing on you, on how you're doing, on if you're being great, are you?
i.e., even the worst sex Ive ever had was still pretty good, and the worst ones are probably the ones that are the most selfish: i.e., they don't want to mess up their hair and makeup.![]()
dr_mabeuse said:You think about it too much.
Shoot, that's the best place!You might consider not coming onto her in the coat closet at the opera, then!![]()
Shoot, that's the best place!
What a lively group this morning.
I have to say, XssVe, I think your AV is offensive. But you knew that when you put it up. I guess when you say snatch, you mean snatch, huh?
I will endure it but IT leaves a very sour taste in my mouth...
"You sick fuck!"You think about it too much. I don't keep score. i tend to be a dom. I look to be in charge, so I compete to be in charge. I can't help it.
No offense, but the last thing I want is someone telling me how to make love.
Allard, what browser do you use? If you don't have firefox, I strongly suggest you get it, and add the adblocker plus option. You can rightclick on xssve's little bit of viciousness and presto, he's avless.I have to say, XssVe, I think your AV is offensive. But you knew that when you put it up. I guess when you say snatch, you mean snatch, huh?
I thought it might get mixed reviews, but it really made me laugh when I saw it.What a lively group this morning.
I have to say, XssVe, I think your AV is offensive. But you knew that when you put it up. I guess when you say snatch, you mean snatch, huh?
I will endure it but IT leaves a very sour taste in my mouth...
That one is fine with me, it's not a comment on the essential nature of women.I thought it might get mixed reviews, but it really made me laugh when I saw it.
How about this one <-- ?