When you discuss the issue of racial slurs before an all-white crowd

Recidiva said:

Awwww...that's sorta adorable. Eltesse also.

Click to expand...

Excellent. I like Eltia too. We'll have to keep working on making the little haters until we have at least two girls.

Ulaven_Demorte said:

Every time I hear it all I can think of is the crazy female astronaut driving cross-country to exact revenge for being jilted.

Did he wear Depends on the trip like she did do you think? It makes me laugh to think so.. Scrawny little internet tough guy shows up at a dojo screaming his head off while holding up his diaper with one hand.. Classic.

Click to expand...

LT strikes me as a "pull-ups" kind of guy.

http://content.answers.com/main/content/wp/en/thumb/a/ae/150px-Pullupsgirlboxold.jpg

Recidiva said:

Shanglan, it's lovely to see someone who goes to both places.

Having those on the AH rail against the GB for being uncivilized and foolish and unintelligent is probably my main reason for being uncomfortable there often.

I take offense on behalf of the many people who are here that are highly civilized, brilliant and charming.

Seeing LT try to play that card and get people who don't know each other at all mad at each other...just all part of the unpleasant game.

Click to expand...

You are such a liar. I never did any such thing.

You manipulated them - and got caught.

CrackerjackHrt said:

i don't know LT's experience with this, so i won't comment on that.

you are absolutely correct, though, about the pernicious effect of racism, of opportunities lost and social ills recycled generation after generation. every time i drive through the delta, that ugly truth slaps me in the face like a maggot-ridden piece of road kill.

eta: it's the ugly truth, too, that makes claiming racism when none exists so offensive; it makes it too easy to dismiss real prejudice.

Click to expand...

This is why the "retaliating to racial slurs with racial slurs" argument is so bankrupt.

You people consistently mark any racial slurs as unoffensive by accusing me of "claiming racism when none exists" every time I point out someone hurling racial slurs.

Utter moral bankruptcy.

Pookie said:

I never said or implied that they cower. The reaction is far from it. They're mature and intelligent enough to know how to properly react to idiots without lowering themselves to the same level. BlackShanglan nailed it too ... amused disdain and similar such reactions.

It's what the evolved people do, LT.

"Man must evolve for all human conflict a method which rejects revenge, aggression and retaliation." - Martin Luther King, Jr.

Evolve, LT. Evolve.

Click to expand...

I have evolved.

I have evolved to the highest level - I make my own rules and I am not bound to obey you. There is no authority and no power over me here.

Yes, you want black people to cower. You want black people to accept being called a 'nigger' and not take offense.

You do not consider calling a black person a 'nigger' wrong.

You never have and never will.

bronzeage said:

The point of the fight scenaro is to impress Lit of how ferocious Lt is when aroused to action.
He lacks the self perception to see how pathetic it makes him appear everytime he tells again of how he was left standing alone on the field of honor, stood up by the challanged party.

This only works if the rest of us gather around and denounce the missing duelist as a coward and unfit for proper society, which hasn't happened. Lt's true crusade is not against racism. That is just a ploy. What he really wants is to have a large group of people publicly agree with him. Racism seems to his best shot at it, but he has underesimated the public's reaction to name calling, which is the only kind of racism he has ever experienced, through the miracle of video tape.

The real true racism, which stifles people's lives at a young age and limits their opportunities as they grow older, Lt has no idea what it means.

Click to expand...

So that's what this is about.

You will abandon every set of morals known to man in order to avoid admitting I'm right.

This has been a consistent behavior with you, with Byron, and many others.


You have argued any crazy stupid point that comes down the pipe just to be on the opposite side from me. You have a habit of standing your ground on the most dead wrong viewpoints just to be against me.

In real life I could easily make you kill yourself.

LovingTongue said:

This is why the "retaliating to racial slurs with racial slurs" argument is so bankrupt.

You people consistently mark any racial slurs as unoffensive by accusing me of "claiming racism when none exists" every time I point out someone hurling racial slurs.

Utter moral bankruptcy.

Click to expand...

No, "us people" point out your use of racial slurs as just as offensive as the person who used them "unprovoked" as you put it.

You disagree and feel justified in your own racism, claiming to be backed by a majority of imaginary people.

This is the best definition of delusion I have ever seen. No matter how many times you are shown to be firmly in the minority, FAR in the minority in fact, you will claim to be righteous and that the "real world" subscribes to your opinion.

You really should look into what morality is LT, if you can stand to look reality in the face long enough to see that morality, by and large, is determined collectively by society. As has been demonstrated repeatedly, you're firmly outside of the majority on this subject. Your actions in using racial slurs in "retaliation" while simultaneously screaming about others using them "unprovoked" is both hypocritical and immoral in the eyes of others. You can create your own morality at any time and live by it. But you can't claim against all evidence to the contrary that you're in some sort of majority in thinking the way you do.

You employ selective outrage toward the usage of racial slurs. It's not OK for someone to use them "unprovoked", but it is OK to use them in "retaliation". You're one of very few people who make that distinction. The vast majority see it as wrong no matter if it's provoked or not. You then accuse them of being selective in their outrage.

The world is just a huge mirror, you see your own actions in everyone around you. You're the caged dog constantly attacking his own reflection.

Ulaven_Demorte said:

No, "us people" point out your use of racial slurs as just as offensive as the person who used them "unprovoked" as you put it.

*snip worthless hypocritical tripe*

Click to expand...

Too late, dumbfuck. You already showed you don't believe in what you are saying.

You have already declared that racial slurs are not racial slurs when thrown around by your white friends. You just got finished saying "you're the nigger of the General Board" isn't a fucking racial slur, douchebag boy.

You're insane. You have no integrity and your morals are utterly phony. You are exactly the person you criticize - except worse. You stand for principles you do not really stand for.

LovingTongue said:

So that's what this is about.
You will abandon every set of morals known to man in order to avoid admitting I'm right.
This has been a consistent behavior with you, with Byron, and many others.
You have argued any crazy stupid point that comes down the pipe just to be on the opposite side from me. You have a habit of standing your ground on the most dead wrong viewpoints just to be against me.
In real life I could easily make you kill yourself.

Click to expand...

I had to quote this.

When you try to appear calm, you look wierder than when you are screaming.

Its not every point. Its the same point over and over again. What you say and what you are remain in conflict with each other. Very little you say has any credibility, because while you can say anything, you cannot change what you are.

LovingTongue said:

Too late, dumbfuck. You already showed you don't believe in what you are saying.

You have already declared that racial slurs are not racial slurs when thrown around by your white friends. You just got finished saying "you're the nigger of the General Board" isn't a fucking racial slur, douchebag boy.

You're insane. You have no integrity and your morals are utterly phony. You are exactly the person you criticize - except worse. You stand for principles you do not really stand for.

Click to expand...

Because providing context means you approve of someone's message...

Keep yapping at the mirror LT, one day that rabid dog will back down.

bronzeage said:

I had to quote this.

When you try to appear calm, you look wierder than when you are screaming.

Its not every point. Its the same point over and over again. What you say and what you are remain in conflict with each other. Very little you say has any credibility, because while you can say anything, you cannot change what you are.

Click to expand...

Funny how you never actually said that there was any error in what I said.

Because I did not say anything that was factually wrong.

You do not care about racial slurs against black people. You think it's petty.

What you say and what you do, does not and will not ever coexist in the same universe.

Fortunately those of us who raged against Don Imus and Michael Richards, both disagree with you, and are in the majority.

Ulaven_Demorte said:

Because providing context means you approve of someone's message...

Keep yapping at the mirror LT, one day that rabid dog will back down.

Click to expand...

Whatever, cuntface.

Show us where you actually criticized that "you're the nigger of the General Board" crap.

Go ahead and show us.

Oh wait, this is where you leave the thread or change the subject. That's because you're a cowardly spineless little twat.

Here's the script: you won't criticize that "you're the nigger of the General Board" crap.

The only open ended question that remains of your upcoming response to me is how you will avoid criticizes Byron's racist remark. Be creative for me, okay? You know you wanna.

LovingTongue said:

Funny how you never actually said that there was any error in what I said.

Because I did not say anything that was factually wrong.

You do not care about racial slurs against black people. You think it's petty.

What you say and what you do, does not and will not ever coexist in the same universe.

Fortunately those of us who raged against Don Imus and Michael Richards, both disagree with you, and are in the majority.

Click to expand...

Oh I've disputed what you say constantly because it has no basis in reality, nor can you provide a single example of my condoning the use of racial slurs. No Virginia, giving context to someone else's use of a term does not mean you approve of it..

Again, your only problem with me is that I brand you with the same iron that you use to label the provocateur.

It's not my beliefs that are inconsistent. I feel that there is no reason to hurl racial slurs at another person. You however, apply subjective outrage to the use of slurs. It's not OK for someone to call you a slur "unprovoked", but it's fine for you to "retaliate" in kind. You're rationalizing your position, the trouble is that you're saying that the majority of people agree with you when that is clearly not the case. I disagree, and so do the vast majority of sane people. This has been demonstrated to you repeatedly.

LovingTongue said:

Funny how you never actually said that there was any error in what I said.

Because I did not say anything that was factually wrong.

You do not care about racial slurs against black people. You think it's petty.

What you say and what you do, does not and will not ever coexist in the same universe.

Fortunately those of us who raged against Don Imus and Michael Richards, both disagree with you, and are in the majority.

Click to expand...

I have pointed out many of your errors. There is the criminal assault you claim to have committed in the mall. That never happened.

Later you claimed to be a repeat offender. That never happened either.

You say there are integrated gangs roaming California, burning the houses of racists. That is an error as well.

You say you have the ablilty to compell me to kill myself. That is really too silly to count as error, so it has to be classified as another of your fantasies.

In the end you remain harmless and a threat to no one.

LovingTongue said:

Whatever, cuntface.

Show us where you actually criticized that "you're the nigger of the General Board" crap.

Go ahead and show us.

Oh wait, this is where you leave the thread or change the subject. That's because you're a cowardly spineless little twat.

Here's the script: you won't criticize that "you're the nigger of the General Board" crap.

The only open ended question that remains of your upcoming response to me is how you will avoid criticizes Byron's racist remark. Be creative for me, okay? You know you wanna.

Click to expand...

I never even saw that comment until you dragged it up MONTHS ago, even then it was ancient history.

Contrary to what you think many people don't even bother to read most of the threads here. Just because you consider it a "high traffic" thread doesn't mean shit.

I'm not responsible for every single bit of bullshit racist crap thats been spewed on the GB or anywhere else. I've condemned the use of racial slurs repeatedly both here and out in the real world, sometimes risking my job in doing so..

You just don't like that I've tossed you into the same hole for "fighting fire with fire".

Ulaven_Demorte said:

Oh I've disputed what you say constantly because it has no basis in reality, nor can you provide a single example of my condoning the use of racial slurs. No Virginia, giving context to someone else's use of a term does not mean you approve of it..

Again, your only problem with me is that I brand you with the same iron that you use to label the provocateur.

It's not my beliefs that are inconsistent. I feel that there is no reason to hurl racial slurs at another person. You however, apply subjective outrage to the use of slurs. It's not OK for someone to call you a slur "unprovoked", but it's fine for you to "retaliate" in kind. You're rationalizing your position, the trouble is that you're saying that the majority of people agree with you when that is clearly not the case. I disagree, and so do the vast majority of sane people. This has been demonstrated to you repeatedly.

Click to expand...

The problem here is YOU do not agree with YOU.

You're now arguing that "LT goaded someone into hurling racial slurs". That takes "he started it!" to a whole new level.

You rationalize racial slurs by saying they're not racial slurs. Or by saying that they were somehow "provoked".

Subjective outrage? Your face sits right next to the definition.

Ulaven_Demorte said:

I never even saw that comment until you dragged it up MONTHS ago, even then it was ancient history.

Click to expand...

http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=24028898&postcount=143
Wrong. It was barely a month ago. September 3rd. Wanna try again?

Contrary to what you think many people don't even bother to read most of the threads here. Just because you consider it a "high traffic" thread doesn't mean shit.

Click to expand...

But yet you can't help but spot mine a mile away. Liar.

I'm not responsible for every single bit of bullshit racist crap thats been spewed on the GB or anywhere else. I've condemned the use of racial slurs repeatedly both here and out in the real world, sometimes risking my job in doing so..

Click to expand...

Except when you think I "goaded" someone into hurling racial slurs.

You just don't like that I've tossed you into the same hole for "fighting fire with fire".

Click to expand...

And in light of your constant justifications of racial slurs when they come from your white buddies, you lack the strength to toss a paper clip, much less me.

LovingTongue said:

The problem here is YOU do not agree with YOU.

You're now arguing that "LT goaded someone into hurling racial slurs". That takes "he started it!" to a whole new level.

You rationalize racial slurs by saying they're not racial slurs. Or by saying that they were somehow "provoked".

Subjective outrage? Your face sits right next to the definition.

Click to expand...

Nope, I'm not approving of their use of a slur against you when you goad them into it any more than I approve of your use of them when you respond to their provocation in the same way.

What I'm saying is that you go looking for a fight, knowing that the person you're goading (like Ishmael, and A_J) will give you reason to vent your anger by spewing racial slurs right back at them. You go looking for people to give you "justification" for your own racist rantings.

The difference between you and me LT, is that no amount of provocation will make me call you by a slur. NONE.


You're barking at the mirror again.

bronzeage said:

I have pointed out many of your errors. There is the criminal assault you claim to have committed in the mall. That never happened.

Later you claimed to be a repeat offender. That never happened either.

You say there are integrated gangs roaming California, burning the houses of racists. That is an error as well.

You say you have the ablilty to compell me to kill myself. That is really too silly to count as error, so it has to be classified as another of your fantasies.

In the end you remain harmless and a threat to no one.

Click to expand...

You've never pointed out any error of mine because I've made none.

LovingTongue said:

http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=24028898&postcount=143
Wrong. It was barely a month ago. September 3rd. Wanna try again?

But yet you can't help but spot mine a mile away. Liar.

Except when you think I "goaded" someone into hurling racial slurs.

And in light of your constant justifications of racial slurs when they come from your white buddies, you lack the strength to toss a paper clip, much less me.

Click to expand...

This is how little I pay attention to that bullshit, but you had been accusing Byron of similar things months before, probably years.

I can't help but spot yours because it seems to seep into every single thread you're a part of. You follow people around and harass them constantly, make threads trying to bait them into conflict constantly, impersonate them constantly... So yes, it gets noticed.

I don't approve of their retaliation to your goading any more than I approve of your reaction to theirs. As for my "white buddies", I don't think I have any of those here. I'm not here for friendship or approval. I'm here for entertainment.

You do manage to entertain.. It's a guilty pleasure.. Like slowing down to have a look at the scene of a horrific accident. You don't really want to but you just HAVE to see.

Ulaven_Demorte said:

This is how little I pay attention to that bullshit

Click to expand...

Translation: when you're wrong, play it down.

but you had been accusing Byron of similar things months before, probably years.

Click to expand...

Yup, and if my accusation is in error, please say so now.

What? Silence? Snippysnippy? I thought so. Cuntbag.

I can't help but spot yours because it seems to seep into every single thread you're a part of.

Click to expand...

If I post a single thread where I did that, you are wrong.

Then again you are known for being wrong and refusing to admit it. Or playing it down.

You follow people around and harass them constantly, make threads trying to bait them into conflict constantly, impersonate them constantly... So yes, it gets noticed.

Click to expand...

So Byron in Exile's racial slurs is not as offensive as what you consider to be "baiting"?

I don't approve of their retaliation to your goading any more than I approve of your reaction to theirs. As for my "white buddies", I don't think I have any of those here. I'm not here for friendship or approval. I'm here for entertainment.

Click to expand...

You will spend years following me around about this, and barely a virtual whisper about them.

It's obvious whose cock you suck.

You do manage to entertain.. It's a guilty pleasure.. Like slowing down to have a look at the scene of a horrific accident. You don't really want to but you just HAVE to see.

Click to expand...

And in that accident you are the pedestrian who keeps getting hit.

LovingTongue said:

You've never pointed out any error of mine because I've made none.

Click to expand...

Now you are just going for laughs.

"I can't help but spot yours because it seems to seep into every single thread you're a part of."

http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=534123

Oh noes. Ulaven Demented is proven wrong again.

Ulaven Demented, dance. Dance, gunface, dance!

Run around the thread now, going "pow! pow! pow!"

LOL.

bronzeage said:

Now you are just going for laughs.

Click to expand...

I'm sure you felt they were errors. I'd hate to tell you you're wrong lest I be accused of baiting you.

Boy, I'd love to see BlackShanglan defend Ulaven's refusal to condemn Byron AND his new "LT goaded him!" argument.

LOL.

This is even funnier than when Ulaven Demorte implied a woman can't lie when she accuses a man of cheating.

UD, you're like the triplane whose guns shot out its own propeller.