So how much would it bug you...

I'd kick his ass...and he'd kick mine. Course, I'd never put myself in that situation, either...so no worries.
 
For someone who hates and whines about having her relationship/personal life kicked all over the board, even after you post about it, you sure know how to drag someone else's through the mud.

You've been around the block long enough to know that some people are into kinkier shit than you are. Some people are into that kind of shit, and even beyond it.

It hardly makes you a prude, however it does make you as much of a bitch as everyone who you think treated you like shit.
 
Angel said:
For someone who hates and whines about having her relationship/personal life kicked all over the board, even after you post about it, you sure know how to drag someone else's through the mud.

You've been around the block long enough to know that some people are into kinkier shit than you are. Some people are into that kind of shit, and even beyond it.

It hardly makes you a prude, however it does make you as much of a bitch as everyone who you think treated you like shit.

At least my opinion was based on a present day occurrence as opposed to shit that happened four years ago. When I did stupid stuff back then, I probably deserved much of it at that time. One thing different about me, though, is that I won't continue to remind her of it for the next four years.

But everyone else is entitled to opinions except for me? I see. Interesting to know. Thanks for the insight. I will try to remember it for the future.
 
Last edited:
Mia62 said:
At least my opinion was based on a present day occurrence as opposed to shit that happened four years ago.

Sooo...everyone else is entitled to opinions except for me? I see. Interesting to know. Thanks for the insight. I will try to remember it for the future.

I don't care when it happened, it's the exact same shit and you know it.

I'd like you to show me where I declared you unable to have an opinion, because I didn't.

I stated mine.


You're free to dislike it as much as I dislike yours.
 
Angel said:
I'd like you to show me where I declared you unable to have an opinion, because I didn't.

This confuses me, too. And I'm seeing / hearing it more often.

Why do people translate disagreeing with someone as some sort of censorship?
 
RoryN said:
This confuses me, too. And I'm seeing / hearing it more often.

Why do people translate disagreeing with someone as some sort of censorship?


So they can pretend they're being attacked? No clue.
 
RoryN said:
This confuses me, too. And I'm seeing / hearing it more often.

Why do people translate disagreeing with someone as some sort of censorship?

I have no problems with people disagreeing with me...it came across as censorship as opposed to having a different opinion. It is all about the delivery.
 
Angel said:
For someone who hates and whines about having her relationship/personal life kicked all over the board, even after you post about it, you sure know how to drag someone else's through the mud.

You've been around the block long enough to know that some people are into kinkier shit than you are. Some people are into that kind of shit, and even beyond it.

It hardly makes you a prude, however it does make you as much of a bitch as everyone who you think treated you like shit.



I think you need to read this again, you seem to be having trouble with your comprehension.
 
Mia62 said:
I have no problems with people disagreeing with me...it came across as censorship as opposed to having a different opinion.

Fair enough. Please illustrate for me how it did.

I try to avoid hypocrisy when posting so, if there's language Angel used which suggested to you that she was stifling your voice, I'd like to avoid using it myself.
 
Sure looks like an attempt to silence her opinion from here. Claiming she is a bitch deserving of years of contempt for voicing her opinion is a form censorship by intimidation.

But then again, we can always count on you to jump on her back, Angel.
 
Cherry said:
Sure looks like an attempt to silence her opinion from here. Claiming she is a bitch deserving of years of contempt for voicing her opinion is a form censorship by intimidation.

You've got to be fucking kidding me. What intimidation?

It's not fair to Mia62 for you to chime in, Cherry. I've read a great deal of your posts, and there are 13-year-olds with a more complete education (and much more integrity) than yourself.

You were wise not to tangle with Pyper, though. That's knowing your limits.
 
RoryN said:
Fair enough. Please illustrate for me how it did.

I try to avoid hypocrisy when posting so, if there's language Angel used which suggested to you that she was stifling your voice, I'd like to avoid using it myself.


Read Cherry's post...she said it better than I could have. But I am editing to add my own thoughts as well.

This was Angel's message to me...

Angel said:
For someone who hates and whines about having her relationship/personal life kicked all over the board, even after you post about it, you sure know how to drag someone else's through the mud.

You've been around the block long enough to know that some people are into kinkier shit than you are. Some people are into that kind of shit, and even beyond it.

It hardly makes you a prude, however it does make you as much of a bitch as everyone who you think treated you like shit.

Show me where Angel disagreed with my opinion. She said that some people are into kinky shit...I agree with that. She did not attempt to answer my original thread question...she spent her time giving me shit for having an opinion about any of this and calling me a bitch for having an opinion. If that is NOT an attempt to stifle my opinion...then could you please show me your reasoning. Thanks in advance.
 
Last edited:
Mia62 said:
Read Cherry's post...she said it better than I could have.

You're in trouble, then...because her post was nothing but vacant garbage.

"Censorship by intimidation" is meaningless wordplay when there's no intimidation involved.
 
Need I remind you, everything is about ME....So quite yer yapping all and let's get busy.... :D
 
RoryN said:
You're in trouble, then...because her post was nothing but vacant garbage.

"Censorship by intimidation" is meaningless wordplay when there's no intimidation involved.


I was adding to my original post as you typed this.

angel-wine, baby... :heart:
 
Mia62 said:
I was adding to my original post as you typed this.

angel-wine, baby... :heart:

Hmmmmm angel-wine.....See Angel we should be making out or something....lol
 
Angel said:
I think you need to read this again, you seem to be having trouble with your comprehension.

Everytime I come on here, (yes I KNOW :rolleyes: , compared to you and many others, I'm a newbie- it certainly doesn't make my opinion any less worthwhile) I read a post from you that is either slamming someone, criticizing someone, making fun (in a bad way) of someone or you're just plain being nasty.

You really must be extremely unhappy to have that much ugliness inside of you. :(
 
RoryN said:
You've got to be fucking kidding me. What intimidation?

It's not fair to Mia62 for you to chime in, Cherry. I've read a great deal of your posts, and there are 13-year-olds with a more complete education (and much more integrity) than yourself.

You were wise not to tangle with Pyper, though. That's knowing your limits.


This is an interesting way to voice your disagreement with Cherry. Throwing out insults always works. As I said earlier...it is all in the delivery.
 
SweetStuf said:
Everytime I come on here, (yes I KNOW :rolleyes: , compared to you and many others, I'm a newbie- it certainly doesn't make my opinion any less worthwhile) I read a post from you that is either slamming someone, criticizing someone, making fun (in a bad way) of someone or you're just plain being nasty.

You really must be extremely unhappy to have that much ugliness inside of you. :(
Angel rawks. Girl takes no shit from nobody, tells it like it is, and can out argue even me. Plus, she's really fucking cute when she gets all riled up.
 
Mia62 said:
Read Cherry's post...she said it better than I could have. But I am editing to add my own thoughts as well.

This was Angel's message to me...



Show me where Angel disagreed with my opinion. She said that some people are into kinky shit...I agree with that. She did not attempt to answer my original thread question...she spent her time giving me shit for having an opinion about any of this and calling me a bitch for having an opinion. If that is NOT an attempt to stifle my opinion...then could you please show me your reasoning. Thanks in advance.


If I wanted to 'stifle your opinion' I would have told you to shut the fuck up.
 
Cherry said:
Sure looks like an attempt to silence her opinion from here. Claiming she is a bitch deserving of years of contempt for voicing her opinion is a form censorship by intimidation.

But then again, we can always count on you to jump on her back, Angel.

Mia's a big girl, and perfectly capable of discussing things on her own. She doesn't need you to babysit her.
 
SweetStuf said:
Everytime I come on here, (yes I KNOW :rolleyes: , compared to you and many others, I'm a newbie- it certainly doesn't make my opinion any less worthwhile) I read a post from you that is either slamming someone, criticizing someone, making fun (in a bad way) of someone or you're just plain being nasty.

You really must be extremely unhappy to have that much ugliness inside of you. :(

You're a fucking moron, and the only person in this thread who actually needs to shut the fuck up. How's that for stifling an opinion?
 
Mia62 said:
To find out when your spouse came home from work that he/she allowed some strange man/woman to touch them sexually at work?

Wait, would it be a strange man or a strange woman?
 
Mia62 said:
Show me where Angel disagreed with my opinion.

She seems to disagree with your rationale behind the thread. So, there you go.

Mia62 said:
She did not attempt to answer my original thread question...she spent her time giving me shit for having an opinion about any of this and calling me a bitch for having an opinion. If that is NOT an attempt to stifle my opinion...then could you please show me your reasoning.

Certainly.

I could call a black man a coon nigger for speaking his mind. That's not censorship, and it's not "stifling" anyone's "opinion". If it were, someone like Martin Luther King Jr. never would have been able to make a speech in Washington D.C. He learned early on that other people's comments weren't force enough to dictate the freedom of his own speech. If he hadn't, we'd never have been witness to his words.

It's not a fucking difficult lesson to learn. And your example is far less severe, so stop whining.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top