Monday, April 15th: First Ever Criminal Trial for a Former US President

Any other defendant would've been in jail already.
I disagree. This kind of maneuvering is pretty common. I usually think it is a waste of time, but Trump has realized he is being tried but public opinion and is fighting back. Most of the judges I have seen in action tend to respect the system and a vigorous defense. If anything, it helps answer every question of fact in the trial.
 
I disagree. This kind of maneuvering is pretty common. I usually think it is a waste of time, but Trump has realized he is being tried but public opinion and is fighting back. Most of the judges I have seen in action tend to respect the system and a vigorous defense. If anything, it helps answer every question of fact in the trial.
You're allowed to be wrong.

Gag orders are pretty straight forward
 
I disagree. This kind of maneuvering is pretty common. I usually think it is a waste of time, but Trump has realized he is being tried but public opinion and is fighting back. Most of the judges I have seen in action tend to respect the system and a vigorous defense. If anything, it helps answer every question of fact in the trial.
^
Keeps telling us they are a cuck to their orange dom.

We know…we know…

😑

👉 defecation 🤣

🇺🇸
 
After watching today's Supreme Court hearing, this is an easy case to solve. Trump isn't claiming he can kill anyone in this NY court and has immunity to do so because he was acting in his capacity as President. [He didn't lose the last one, so technically, he is still President.]

If he prevails in The Supreme Court, then hell, all hell will break loose if he gets re-elected. [Hoping for that not to happen as a majority of Americans sense he as insane as hell.]
 
After watching today's Supreme Court hearing, this is an easy case to solve. Trump isn't claiming he can kill anyone in this NY court and has immunity to do so because he was acting in his capacity as President. [He didn't lose the last one, so technically, he is still President.]

If he prevails in The Supreme Court, then hell, all hell will break loose if he gets re-elected. [Hoping for that not to happen as a majority of Americans sense he as insane as hell.]
The courts will never agree to full immunity, by that same debate they will never remove all forms of immunity. Defining presidential authority, acting in presidential capacity as apposed to deriving personal gain from criminal actions seems to be the delicate balance the court is trying to establish. It appeared to me, listening to the debate that the court still prefers the current method to deal with rogue presidents and that’s through impeachment and trial by the senate then referral for prosecution.
 
Last edited:
This is not rocket science.

If a President is deemed immune from prosecution for rejecting the peaceful transfer of power following all unsuccessful appeals and recounts, then fascists will be "President" for life.

The SCOTUS political hacks, aka the Federalist Society, are simply stalling. Justice delayed is justice denied.
 
Happy birthday, Melania Trump. Her present is that she has the full day to do whatever she wants and go wherever she wants without the fear that hubby will show up. He's busy at his criminal trial for screwing a porn star while wife, Melania, was sitting at home.
 
^^^^ You know who we never hear from?


Marla.


Must be a helluva settlement and NDA.
 
Maybe we have a countdown to when Bragg drops the case out of embarrassment. Merchan is slowly starting to look like a fool for entertaining this fraud case.
Bragg is turning out to be Trump's best attorney. This mockery of the justice system is collapsing of its own weight. Only a dipshit fuck up like Bragg would start a criminal prosecution without defining a crime that was broken.
 
I think we hit peak lawfare sometime in the last few days.
At this point of absurdity in the trial, it becomes more and more clear that its purpose is to keep Trump off the campaign trail, not put him in jail. This is a conspiracy among Trump-hating Democrats to interfere in the election process. No alleged crime has been identified by the prosecution. It's all part of the same plan between three Marxist prosecutors and a crazed leftist Special prosecutor of known ill repute, All trying their best to imprison and destroy their chief political opponent with 91 phony combined charges, the most serious of which were the same charges the DOJ refused to prosecute Joe Biden for. It was noted this morning that Charles Manson only faced ten charges.
 
Last edited:
At this point of absurdity in the trial, it becomes more and more clear that its purpose is to keep Trump off the campaign trail.
This has become clear. Also his many trials and suits look like a coordinate effort, even if informally so.
 
At this point of absurdity in the trial, it becomes more and more clear that its purpose is to keep Trump off the campaign trail. not put him in jail. This is a conspiracy among Trump-hating Democrats to interfere in the election process. No alleged crime has been identified by the prosecution. It's all part of the same plan between three Marxist prosecutors and a crazed leftist Special prosecutor of known ill repute, All trying their best to imprison and destroy their chief political opponent with 91 phony combined charges, the most serious of which were the same charges the DOJ refused to prosecute Joe Biden for. It was noted this morning that Charles Manson only faced ten charges.
I find it appalling that with the absence of a crime, the charges are not included in the indictment and that the prosecution is trying to convict Trump by convincing a jury that although Trump is not guilty of a statute violation he’s still guilty because Orange man bad?? How is that not prosecutorial malfeasance? Why isn’t the Bar association involved. Why isn’t the appellate court intervening in this sham trial.
 
This has become clear. Also his many trials and suits look like a coordinate effort, even if informally so.
The White House and the DOJ are heavily involved in these cases. The former number 3 DOJ official is assisting the New York prosecution.
 
I find it appalling that with the absence of a crime, the charges are not included in the indictment and that the prosecution is trying to convict Trump by convincing a jury that although Trump is not guilty of a statute violation he’s still guilty because Orange man bad?? How is that not prosecutorial malfeasance? Why isn’t the Bar association involved. Why isn’t the appellate court intervening in this sham trial.
The judge should be prosecuted for officiating a kangaroo court.
 
The White House and the DOJ are heavily involved in these cases. The former number 3 DOJ official is assisting the New York prosecution.
He quit the third highest position in the DOJ to be a prosecutor under Bragg, NOTHING POLITICAL ABOUT THAT? Rearranging career progression to bag Trump is TDS on steroids, just proves most of these high level justice department individuals are corrupt to the core. Deep state is alive and well.
 
He quit the third highest position in the DOJ to be a prosecutor under Bragg, NOTHING POLITICAL ABOUT THAT? Rearranging career progression to bag Trump is TDS on steroids, just proves most of these high level justice department individuals are corrupt to the core. Deep state is alive and well.
Seeking to prosecute criminals isn't political, dumbass.
 
Back
Top