Too much brown for rightist men on here.
They start hyperventilating. Fuck them.
No one cares about COLOR, dingbat, but YU and your fellow NIGGERS
Its NIGGERS we dont want or like or need
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Too much brown for rightist men on here.
They start hyperventilating. Fuck them.
I'd take a hundred of any one of these black folks before I'd ever vote for a white liberal Democrat:
https://www.***********/list/republ...he-black-republican-list/famous-conservatives
Banhammered virus site. Nicely done, Gunny Shitforbrains.
Leave it to vette to foul up a hyperlink.
Banhammered virus site. Nicely done, Gunny Shitforbrains.
Any listed here, Clown Pants:
http://politi*****/2013/04/30/list-of-100-black-conservative-blogs-and-websites/
After socialism has been firmly supported in some form, things like religion, skin color, gender and sexual orientation are THE most important thing for Democrats as with most lefties.
They need to know who to discriminate against and how much in order for them to promote their concepts of social and economic equity, the primary concern of their politics.
Too much brown for rightist men on here.
They start hyperventilating. Fuck them.
For those you rail against as "Rightists," skin color is the least important metric by which to measure the "triumphs" of the rise of "brown" people that you and Chino employ. What matters is the ideology that so many of you/them have adopted, that you/they have a "right" to take from those whom you/they view as having an unfair advantage (being white) to hand over to those whom you/they deemed "oppressed," but as we see, most of the time they are not oppressed by "white" culture, but the culture of race grievance that you have adopted as the greater social reality than the ancient, even Biblical, wisdom that one generally reaps what one sows.
When you teach a minority to be oppressed, they will most certainly self-repress. They will retreat into their tribe and forego their natural right to be individuals and then, as we see with these celebrated "brown" Socialists (like Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren) rising up politically we don't see the politics of race, but the politics of wealth envy and the politics of wealth distribution that has retarded every civilization where it has been implemented.
When you teach a minority that his/her character matters more than the color and status of his/her skin color, then you have a person able to rise to the heights that our culture of Capitalism has to offer, and there are several of us here who can attest to that reality, but instead of letting us testify to that reality, we are castigated as some sort of race traitors, sellouts to our assigned "tribe."
You are the problem. Not me. Not Botany, not even RightGuide or busybody because we don't tell them members of your tribe that they cannot succeed because they are "brown," you do. We only tell them that they cannot succeed when they make their tribe more important than they are as individuals.
Thank you for translating my remarks into Democrat "sign language."
Thank you for translating my bullshit and histrionic flailing into republican virtue signaling
It strikes me that "white privilege" has been pretty much eradicated in a lot of South America and seeing all the social turmoil there, I would have to surmise that white privilege is a dog whistle for the abolition of the Capitalism of the individual in favor of the Socialism of the tribe, and as you point out, "the tribe" is a temporary and ever-shifting construct based on the tyranny of the majority of the moment, most of which are being led by a tiny minority that has seized the means to make promises of a prosperity for the masses that never materializes.
For those you rail against as "Rightists," skin color is the least important metric by which to measure the "triumphs" of the rise of "brown" people that you and Chino employ. What matters is the ideology that so many of you/them have adopted, that you/they have a "right" to take from those whom you/they view as having an unfair advantage (being white) to hand over to those whom you/they deemed "oppressed," but as we see, most of the time they are not oppressed by "white" culture, but the culture of race grievance that you have adopted as the greater social reality than the ancient, even Biblical, wisdom that one generally reaps what one sows.
When you teach a minority to be oppressed, they will most certainly self-repress. They will retreat into their tribe and forego their natural right to be individuals and then, as we see with these celebrated "brown" Socialists (like Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren) rising up politically we don't see the politics of race, but the politics of wealth envy and the politics of wealth distribution that has retarded every civilization where it has been implemented.
When you teach a minority that his/her character matters more than the color and status of his/her skin color, then you have a person able to rise to the heights that our culture of Capitalism has to offer, and there are several of us here who can attest to that reality, but instead of letting us testify to that reality, we are castigated as some sort of race traitors, sellouts to our assigned "tribe."
You are the problem. Not me. Not Botany, not even RightGuide or busybody because we don't tell them members of your tribe that they cannot succeed because they are "brown," you do. We only tell them that they cannot succeed when they make their tribe more important than they are as individuals.
man are the brown people killing each other or are they protecting their tribe? you say some really opposing views a lot, lol
A total dispossession of the majority with wealth and property seizures adjudicated by People's Courts ala North Korea would be right up the Democrat alley.
It strikes me that "white privilege" has been pretty much eradicated in a lot of South America and seeing all the social turmoil there, I would have to surmise that white privilege is a dog whistle for the abolition of the Capitalism of the individual in favor of the Socialism of the tribe, and as you point out, "the tribe" is a temporary and ever-shifting construct based on the tyranny of the majority of the moment, most of which are being led by a tiny minority that has seized the means to make promises of a prosperity for the masses that never materializes.
man are the brown people killing each other or are they protecting their tribe? you say some really opposing views a lot, lol
Often within the same thread!
#SituationalRedManSpeaksWithForkedTongue
Listening to the day's proceedings, the Democrats seem to be yearning for gun control, unlimited abortion and a DOJ that is adversarial to executive power. I'd say they want to be more like China where the the Party controls the flow of information and define illegality on the fly and criminalizes any person not in lockstep with the party.
So many triggered totally not Republicans.