Will Trump end up being a net + or -

I think you're going to be late for study hall. :)

Do you have anything happening in your life beyond the GB?

Well, it makes sense that a Stable Genius would emerge during this time when so many people are living in a virtual right-wing world.
 
He "emerged" because the Democrats and RINOs were screwing the pooch and it enraged a fair number of traditional Democrats that got labeled as "deplorables." When you come in here daily with your anger and name-calling it is a constant reminder to everyone what drove voters to embrace Trump.
 
Do you have anything happening in your life beyond the GB?

Well, it makes sense that a Stable Genius would emerge during this time when so many people are living in a virtual right-wing world.

There's the bell. You better get crackin' or your're going to be late for first period. :)
 
He "emerged" because yada yada...
Ten million more voted against him than for him. HRC beat him by almost 3 million votes. He 'emerged' a loser who won the contest by 75k votes in three counties. Yeah, Dums screwed pooches, by being corporate instead of populist. Victory was handed to them on a platter and they played frisbee. That compounds their extended local losses.

But Dums' fuckups don't make Tromp a valid ruler. He does not possess the consent of the governed. He's the last gasp of a dying demographic. Pathetic.
 
Ten million more voted against him than for him. HRC beat him by almost 3 million votes. He 'emerged' a loser who won the contest by 75k votes in three counties. Yeah, Dums screwed pooches, by being corporate instead of populist. Victory was handed to them on a platter and they played frisbee. That compounds their extended local losses.

But Dums' fuckups don't make Tromp a valid ruler. He does not possess the consent of the governed. He's the last gasp of a dying demographic. Pathetic.

I believe that having enough votes to win the electoral college DOES provide him with the consent of the governed.

H garnered 3 million votes more than Trump. She got 4 million in California alone. Take California's huge voting base out of the equation and she LOST the "popular vote" by 1 million votes across the rest of the country. Yet you can't see or admit that she was unpopular. Or that she was outplayed by a neophyte at the game she'd spent her entire life learning to play. THIS the candidate you champion? An unpopular LOOSER? :rolleyes:

On the bright side, maybe we should encourage California to secede?
 
Ten million more voted against him than for him. HRC beat him by almost 3 million votes. He 'emerged' a loser who won the contest by 75k votes in three counties. Yeah, Dums screwed pooches, by being corporate instead of populist. Victory was handed to them on a platter and they played frisbee. That compounds their extended local losses.

But Dums' fuckups don't make Tromp a valid ruler. He does not possess the consent of the governed. He's the last gasp of a dying demographic. Pathetic.

So Obama lacked "the consent of the governed" in every state he lost? Good to know!
 
Ten million more voted against him than for him. HRC beat him by almost 3 million votes. He 'emerged' a loser who won the contest by 75k votes in three counties. Yeah, Dums screwed pooches, by being corporate instead of populist. Victory was handed to them on a platter and they played frisbee. That compounds their extended local losses.

But Dums' fuckups don't make Tromp a valid ruler. He does not possess the consent of the governed. He's the last gasp of a dying demographic. Pathetic.

You are like a degenerate drunk fisherman. With every retelling, the number gets bigger. If I were you, I'd keep it under 300 million.
 
Do you have anything happening in your life beyond the GB?

Well, it makes sense that a Stable Genius would emerge during this time when so many people are living in a virtual right-wing world.

Tooo funny. The "virtual world" has been consistently overrun with left leaning memes produced by among others Soros well-funded media creation entities. Major providers of platforms to disseminate that, have actively suppressed right leading thought and have actively promoted left-leaning thought. What world are you living in other than the world where you need to make excuses that you had a shitty candidate.

What kind of a loser comes on to the internet to try to castigate other people for being on the internet? If I other's presence here is causing you to spit all over your screen perhaps you should log off and take a break.
 
Ten million more voted against him than for him. HRC beat him by almost 3 million votes. He 'emerged' a loser who won the contest by 75k votes in three counties. Yeah, Dums screwed pooches, by being corporate instead of populist. Victory was handed to them on a platter and they played frisbee. That compounds their extended local losses.

But Dums' fuckups don't make Tromp a valid ruler. He does not possess the consent of the governed. He's the last gasp of a dying demographic. Pathetic.

Yes and as stated before if the Queen had balls she would be King.

Points and laughs... still.

PSA, they make an ointment for that butt hurt.
 
Ten million more voted against him than for him. HRC beat him by almost 3 million votes. He 'emerged' a loser who won the contest by 75k votes in three counties. Yeah, Dums screwed pooches, by being corporate instead of populist. Victory was handed to them on a platter and they played frisbee. That compounds their extended local losses.

But Dums' fuckups don't make Tromp a valid ruler. He does not possess the consent of the governed. He's the last gasp of a dying demographic. Pathetic.

More people voted against Trump than voted for him, but you could say that about every candidate in the election. Counting Gary Johnson as a Republican, which he is, the GOP received more votes than the Dems, even if you include write in votes for Bernie.
 
Amerikkka, where luzers are winners! What a republic!

Okay, I've said that before. Yes, Tromp won the game. Over 1/3 of citizens despise him. What a win! His policies are hated by popular majorities. What a leader!

Go on, drink the kool-aid. Tell yourself that this is good. Is this the legacy you want for your grandkids? Really? You hate them that much?
 
No.

Only Repugnicans would think that Hillary is responsible for the crisis being created by the Stable Genius.

I think it's safe to say Hillary is largely responsible for Trump wining the election. She was seen as a disaster and, if she hadn't bullied and bullshitted her way to winning the nomination, somebody else would have won it, and that person very likely would have won the election. This is a moot question now, and there's no way of proving it, but it does seem logical.
 
Amerikkka, where luzers are winners! What a republic!

Okay, I've said that before. Yes, Tromp won the game. Over 1/3 of citizens despise him. What a win! His policies are hated by popular majorities. What a leader!

Go on, drink the kool-aid. Tell yourself that this is good. Is this the legacy you want for your grandkids? Really? You hate them that much?

This is true, or close to true, but Trump is probably less despised than his opponent in the 2016 election.
 
This is true, or close to true, but Trump is probably less despised than his opponent in the 2016 election.
Oh, he won the game. And without those 75k votes, HRC as POTUS would face terrible shit now too, but less of her own making. Point is, Tromp and Gups act as if they have a mandate and they don't. This does not bode well.
 
Oh, he won the game. And without those 75k votes, HRC as POTUS would face terrible shit now too, but less of her own making. Point is, Tromp and Gups act as if they have a mandate and they don't. This does not bode well.

You keep harping on these 75,000 votes. Why? Hillary certainly carried some counties by a lot more than that.
 
No.

Only Repugnicans would think that Hillary is responsible for the crisis being created by the Stable Genius.
Well, she is in a sense, since she was such a shit candidate and the DNC should never have backed her.
 
Well, she is in a sense, since she was such a shit candidate and the DNC should never have backed her.
What other Dums had worked for the party as long, and at such high levels? What other Dums had spend years build a campaign machine? What other Dums had the exposure to be contenders?

Dums failures were 1) not nurturing local, state, regional candidates in prior decades, a talent pool for national office, and 2) not building a media empire. Gups got the optics down. Dums are too corporate and general. And polite.

Even with their misguided organization, Dums still got HRC a popular victory, just as polls had predicted. Our electoral system rewards losers. See how well THAT works, hey? The last installed POTUS (Dubya) sure dipped us in shit.
 
Back
Top